Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analyzing spike in control performance #677

Closed
gevro opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Analyzing spike in control performance #677

gevro opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@gevro
Copy link

gevro commented Jun 23, 2024

Hi, What is the best practice for conversion efficiency analysis of spike in control DNAs?

Would the aligned BAM file be split to include only or exclude reads aligned to spike in contigs, and run methylation extraction separately on each pf the BAM files?

@gevro
Copy link
Author

gevro commented Jun 23, 2024

My other thought is to run bismark 3 separate times: once with the species genome, once with positive control spike-in fasta, and once with a negative control spike-in fasta. That way I can make separate methylation coverage reports for each and the species genome report won't be confounded by the spike-ins.

@FelixKrueger
Copy link
Owner

You can either include the two (positive and negative control) spike-ins as additional 'chromosomes' for the main alignment, or, as you suggested, run them individually. In the latter case, the alignments should be very fast as the genomes are only tiny.

@gevro gevro closed this as completed Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants