-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Analyzing spike in control performance #677
Comments
My other thought is to run bismark 3 separate times: once with the species genome, once with positive control spike-in fasta, and once with a negative control spike-in fasta. That way I can make separate methylation coverage reports for each and the species genome report won't be confounded by the spike-ins. |
You can either include the two (positive and negative control) spike-ins as additional 'chromosomes' for the main alignment, or, as you suggested, run them individually. In the latter case, the alignments should be very fast as the genomes are only tiny. |
Hi, What is the best practice for conversion efficiency analysis of spike in control DNAs?
Would the aligned BAM file be split to include only or exclude reads aligned to spike in contigs, and run methylation extraction separately on each pf the BAM files?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: