Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Reporter for the supervised baseline, not sklearn LogisticRegression #88

Closed
norabelrose opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #103
Closed

Use Reporter for the supervised baseline, not sklearn LogisticRegression #88

norabelrose opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #103

Comments

@norabelrose
Copy link
Member

Currently the main bottleneck in the training phase is fitting the scikit-learn LogisticRegression models, not the actual fitting of the reporters. This is because LogisticRegression is done on the CPU. But we could easily replicate ~the same results by fitting Reporter objects with a purely supervised loss, and this should speed up the training process dramatically.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant