Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A question about the differences between wgbs-pipeline and dna-me-pipeline #57

Closed
QianhuiWan opened this issue Jan 8, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@QianhuiWan
Copy link

Hello, I found dna-me-pipeline and wgbs-pipeline from ENCODE, what are the differences between these 2 pipelines in terms of analysing WGBS data? Thank you so much! Best regards, Qianhui

@QianhuiWan QianhuiWan changed the title A question about dna-me-pipeline A question about the differences between wgbs-pipeline and dna-me-pipeline Jan 8, 2021
@paul-sud
Copy link
Contributor

paul-sud commented Jan 8, 2021

Hi Qianhui,

dna-me-pipeline is older and only runs on DNAnexus. It was used to process ENCODE data some time ago. That pipeline uses Bowtie2 for alignment and Bismark for methylation calls, among other software. You can find a high-level schematic here: https://www.encodeproject.org/pipelines/ENCPL985BLO/

wgbs-pipeline is newer and will be used to process ENCODE data going forward. It is based on WDL and can run on multiple platforms. It uses gemBS for alignment and methylation calling and also includes smoothing of CpG methylation values via Bsmooth.

I hope that helps, please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Best,

Paul

@QianhuiWan
Copy link
Author

Hi Paul,

Thank you for your answer which is very helpful. I will try WGBS-pipeline for my data.

Best regards
Qianhui

@paul-sud
Copy link
Contributor

paul-sud commented Jan 8, 2021

Glad to help. I'll close this issue, but please feel free to reopen if you have any further questions.

@paul-sud paul-sud closed this as completed Jan 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants