Multiple definitions on classes might cause unintended behaviour

[matentzn]

Since all definitions on the same class become logically equivalent, we might get some strange inferences such as entities that ('s depends on' some 'cell in vitro') are equivalent to ('bearer of' some 'cell morphology phenotype'). IMHO, multiple definitions on the same class should be avoided in general.

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000020
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000024
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000027
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000102
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000104
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000150
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000163
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000165
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000166
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000176
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000188
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000194
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000219
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000249
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000283
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000290
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000304
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000306
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000414
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000415
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000427
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000429
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/cmpo/CMPO_0000431