Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

integrated or merged data? #38

Open
algarji opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

integrated or merged data? #38

algarji opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@algarji
Copy link

algarji commented Dec 10, 2021

I was wondering if this CrossTalkeR pipeline could be applied in merged data from two or more 10x runs.

I think that this makes more sense in integrated data, where cells with shared similar global identity are grouped together despite their differences, and so cellphonedb or CrossTalkeR can further explore LR interactions per condition.

However, in my case, integration is not an option as it mixes populations of cells that are important to be separated in different clusters, so I directly merged data. With merged data, clusters of cells are going to be very similar regardless condition (and differences in cell count per cluster can be also important between conditions). Despite this, when I use CrossTalker I can see enrichment in some LR interactions.

Do you think that CrossTalkeR can be performed with merged data? If not, maybe a solution could be to integrate data just to follow this pipeline, or maybe to take very general clusters (e.g. NK + cd8_eff + gd --> cytotoxic), and so the effect of LR interactions between conditions will be easier to assess.

@jsnagai jsnagai added the question Further information is requested label Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants