-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pyrenew tutorial review #191
Pyrenew tutorial review #191
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #191 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.71% 92.71%
=======================================
Files 40 40
Lines 906 906
=======================================
Hits 840 840
Misses 66 66
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
I liked the diagram here: https://github.com/CDCgov/multisignal-epi-inference/tree/main/model#readme and can be effective visualization to show |
@sbidari Would it be appropriate to also address these comments from @cherz4 in this PR? If not, please create additional issues related to the points discussed on Teams. |
Yes, will include more instructions for poetry installation. |
Re: 2 - I think this would be a good place to add some installation instructions: Specifically, I'd suggest a Prerequisites section before The fundamentals that reads something like this: PrerequisitesThis tutorial assumes some pre-existing knowledge of infectious disease dynamics and Python programming. Before you dive in, we recommend:
|
Minor: I think this phrasing makes it sound like we're taking the ratio
|
…rence into 166-zib2-identify-areas-for-improvement-in-tutorials-and-tests
Changes to the tutorial/documentation in this PR:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR does not address tests, which is fine. However, we should change the title of the PR and make sure we still have an open issue for the tests.
…rence into 166-zib2-identify-areas-for-improvement-in-tutorials-and-tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add the new/renamed tutorials to the website navigation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there is still plenty of room for improvement in the tutorials, but this is a big step in the right direction. Thanks @sbidari!
Some ideas for improving the documentation
HospitalAdmissionsModel
in Pyrenew demo and the one in Fitting a Hospital Admissions-only model. Perhaps clarify what the two tutorials are trying to convey.I can make most of these changes (might need some help on 1) if we think these would be useful.