You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the paper that was recently published during the HotCarbon conference a different value is mentioned:
For a given model, the TechPowerUp SSD specs database [35] can be used to estimate the idle and active (averaged) power consumption values. For RAM banks, we use the averaged values from [33]: 0.19 W /GB and 0.54 W /GB in idle and active states, respectively. By default, RAM banks are constantly considered in an active state.
At the moment, the coefficient value 0.284 W/GB is used in the implementation.
Source code:
boaviztapi/boaviztapi/model/consumption_profile/consumption_profile.py
Line 30 in 4af9f11
Docs: https://doc.api.boavizta.org/Explanations/components/ram/#determining-the-parameters
In the paper that was recently published during the HotCarbon conference a different value is mentioned:
Source: Simon, T. et al. (2024) ‘BoaviztAPI: a bottom-up model to assess the environmental impacts of cloud services’, in. HotCarbon 2024. Available at: https://hotcarbon.org/assets/2024/pdf/hotcarbon24-final74.pdf
This seems to me as an inconsistency. Which value is more accurate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: