Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
I would prefer a enableService option over a disableService option, because I think it's better to select the services you need instead of deselecting those you don't want. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If possibly I would advocate instead for a conditional import, where it logs failure to run, but doesnt require explicit disabling enabling from the user. If that isnt possible, then I think the best thing would be to explicitly enable which we use. Again though, I think the better solution was it tries import, if fails logs stderr, and just continues without making the service emit anything, thereby making it useless. EDIT: Do you think you could clarify the behaviour of importing them from singular js files, and how that would be different from doing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I thought about how enable/disable service config option would work and currently there would be a cyclic import because of the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There was a question on the Discord server about why there are builtin services. There is also #107
How about removing the builtin services and instead let users pick services by having them in a single js file which they can import from. This would also allow for tweaking them
16 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions