Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snapshot versions to include child taxa #246

Open
m-r-c opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Snapshot versions to include child taxa #246

m-r-c opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@m-r-c
Copy link
Contributor

m-r-c commented Jan 28, 2016

  1. When creating a snapshot version of a profile:
    1. Automatically create a snapshot version of all child taxa
    2. Comprise a list of the specific versions of all child taxa
    3. Include child taxa in the parent snapshot pdf
    4. Add an appendix listing the specific versions (with doi references) of the child taxa
@m-r-c m-r-c added the UAT label Jan 28, 2016
@m-hope
Copy link

m-hope commented Feb 23, 2017

Also there needs to be a choice of inclusion of child taxa or not at time PDF created.

@ChrisPalmer1
Copy link
Collaborator

High priority

@RobinaSanderson
Copy link

Snapshot is: Archive of what the profile looked like before the last edit.
Needs to be an option that can be turned on and off.

Middle priority agreed by eFlora team on 22/3/2017

@RobinaSanderson
Copy link

RobinaSanderson commented Mar 30, 2017

Does the asynchronous process for including children (email to user) block the snapshot?

@RobinaSanderson
Copy link

Should the collection wide limit on the number of child taxa apply to this function?

@KevinThiele
Copy link
Collaborator

The ABRS guys will need to answer that question Robina. On one hand, snapshotting could usefully be restricted to a single profile - this is the state of this profile at this time. On the other hand, a snapshot of, say, a genus profile that includes all children gives more information - this is the state of this profile and these are all its children at this time. For this latter to be useful, we'd need to be able to include all of e.g. Acacia's children, which appears to be non-do-able. So I reckon it would be OK for snapshots to not include children at all, the information in the snapshot thus only fulfilling the first function.,

@ChrisPalmer1
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, with the issues we've seen with including all child taxa when there are very many, I think it's probably best to restrict this function for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants