-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pterostylis sp. aff. boormanii (Sunset Country) being returned rather than Pterostylis sp. aff. boormanii #207
Comments
Notes from Doug: Worked it out, The taxon.txt entry is The core problem here is that synonyms don’t have much higher taxonomic information and so don’t get the “owned=by” boost. Fix would be to either have a synonym inherit it’s defaultScore from the default score of the accepted taxon, as well as the parent for accepted taxa (not a bad idea) or adding an extra rule to detect “Genus (sp.?)? (aff.?)? (cf.)? epithet (Geographic)” in the name (hard to do without complications with authors) |
An additional issue here may be that Pterostylis sp. aff. boormanii (Sunset Country) isn't being attached to the genus Pterostylis, it's being attached (as a species) to the family Orchidaceae - even though in the taxon.csv file from APC, it's ParentNameUseageID is identical to Pterostylis boormanii which is being placed properly under the genus. Need to figure out why that's occurring - this may be causing excluded names to be matched to a family level rather than a genus level. |
In the name matching Unit Tests - AlaNameSearcherTest.testAffLookup1
Pterostylis sp. aff. boormanii (Sunset Country) is being returned rather than Pterostylis sp. aff. boormanii.
(Sunset Country) is an excluded name, but is coming up with a higher score the Pterostylis sp. aff. boormanii,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: