Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AICH, UP and OH datasets #75

Open
tiangexiang opened this issue Sep 16, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

AICH, UP and OH datasets #75

tiangexiang opened this issue Sep 16, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@tiangexiang
Copy link

Thanks for your outstanding work and repo!

In your paper, you have noticed that AICH, UP and OH datasets are also included during training (and the dataloaders are provided). However, it seems that they are missing in the data preparation guide and cannot be downloaded.

Is it possible that you can provide these data as well?

Thanks again!

@Arthur151
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for your reminding. The training code is released to re-implement our ICCV paper. In the latest ICCV paper, we have dropped the usage of redundant datasets for comparison. But for your convenience of training different datasets, we release the related code. I just upload the latest version of ROMP to ArXiv. If you are interested in these datasets, you can get access to them via these links, 3DOH50K, UP.

@tiangexiang
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your response! Just double check, in your ICCV paper:

  1. The only datasets that have SMPL param gts you used are h36m and MPII?
  2. Did your use the 3DPW val set or the test set in Table 1 (protocol 1)?
  3. Also, in Table 2 (protocol 2), did you use any gts during inference?

Thanks for your time!!

@Arthur151
Copy link
Owner

  1. The "SMPL param gts" come from Human3.6M. MPI-INF-3DHP doesn't have the SMPL parameters provided.
  2. The evaluation protocol 1 (Tab. 1) uses the entire 3DPW dataset.
  3. ROMP takes the entire image are input (not the cropped image patches). We don't need any gts during inference.

@tiangexiang
Copy link
Author

Hi, in your Tab. 1 you compared directly to BMP. However, in the BMP paper, they claimed they only used 3DPW testing set for evaluation (Tab. 5), but you used the entire 3DPW dataset (train+val+testing) for evaluation?
Can you please confirm this, please? Thanks!

@Arthur151
Copy link
Owner

Arthur151 commented Oct 4, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants