Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Delhi

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Delhi. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Delhi|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Delhi. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Delhi/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Articles for deletion

Tajinder Bagga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject fails WP:NPOL , Bagga has never been elected to any legislative body. Additionally he also fails WP:NBIO as being a mere national secretary of a political party's youth wing does not make one notable. The sources cited here also do not provide WP:SIGCOV and those that do fall under the purview of WP:NEWSORGINDIA as undisclosed press releases because they do not identify an individual author/reporter and have only generic bylines with promotional tone or are puff pieces. [1][2]. - Ratnahastin (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. - Ratnahastin (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject clearly fails WP:NPOL. Currently, the Subject is a contestant on Bigg Boss 18, but all the news coverage is solely related to their participation in the show. As the nominator rightly pointed out, the coverage primarily comes from WP:NEWSORGINDIA sources. Hence, I don't believe the subject satisfies WP:GNG either. Baqi:) (talk) 09:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BLP. Cited with poor sources that does not meet with the guidelines. Garudam ^Talk! 13:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nomination. Zuck28 (talk) 13:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Delete Subject was a candidate but never elected to any political post. This is yet another case of WP:TOOSOON. Maybe in the future they can be elected into a position, I see they have some interesting profile too. Cases of kidnap and other atrocities unfortunately all these are not enough to make him notable to own an article right now. Tesleemah (talk) 13:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I agree that this subject fails WP:POL and WP:BIO. WP:SIGCOV is also in question due to WP:NEWSORGINDIA. As stated by Tesleemah, this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: there seem to be some useful sources in the article about his arrest and participation in a reality show. Though without bylines, the headlines of some of the sources do not suggest being promotional pieces. Mekomo (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I started this article and since creation it has become longer than the ones in Hindi and Tamil. The edit by User:DreamRimmer suggested to me that the subject was notable for multiple events so is there a fundamental difference by language wiki? If notability is different for the English wiki the link should redirect to Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 18 instead. Moondragon21 (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too soon. Pure conjecture. Bearian (talk) 03:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Being a house mate in Bigg Boss Season 18 and a politician who just fought but not elected does not qualify Notability guidelines especially WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Taabii (talk) 13:40, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there is sufficient coverage to pass SIGCOV. Deccan Herald has 22 articles about Bagga, all unrelated to the reality show, see [3]. Take for example this article from 2022 ("Accustomed to being around controversy, Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga has again made it to the headlines after getting three states involved in his arrest"). See also more recent coverage in Hindustan Times, Indian Express, India Today, DNA India, as well as older coverage in The Hindu, The Hindu, again, Outlook, The Tribune, The Telegraph, Firstpost, etc etc. And this is without dwelving into non-English media outlets. Regardless of what one think regarding of the individual, it is clear he is a public figure from multiple events and controversies over a number of years. --Soman (talk) 11:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naved Aslam

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Unsourced BLP. No indication of significance. Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creep^Talk 14:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Delhi and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a reference so it's not unreferenced, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject has worked in numerous movies and has also been part of multiple television shows. Previously, the article relied on a single source, but I have now added several new sources to improve its credibility. The subject clearly meets the criteria outlined in WP:ENT. Baqi:) (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As it stands now there clearly is not a consensus for any course of action. Hopefulyy another week will remedy that.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 01:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A notable actor, active since 90s, worked in multiple notable filmd and Tv Shows, passes WP:NACTOR. Zuck28 (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]