User talk:Ilikeyoutoo yay

Welcome!

Hello, Ilikeyoutoo yay! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 19:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sexual intercourse, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You're new so I wouldn't expect you to understand WP:VERIFY. Doug Weller talk 09:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Handling controversies in articles

Please read Wikipedia:Criticism.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, apologies for any mistake :) Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laxminarayan Innovation Technological University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambani family (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

For this topic to be notable, we would need to see sources meeting WP:GNG with coverage of the family as a whole, not about individual members thereof. In any case, I don't see what salient new content this adds, beyond what is already included in Ambani and Antilia (building).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ambani family and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilikeyoutoo yay! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ambani family

Hello, Ilikeyoutoo yay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ambani family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Bhavish Aggarwal regarding his homophobic comments

This is regarding your edit on Bhavish Aggarwal in which you removed the word controversy and replaced it with "personal views." The reason for this seems a bit inexplicable to me. The point is that his personal views did create a controversy. Everyone have personal views and they do not have a place in Wikipedia, only those views which are controversial in this case allegedly homophobic are included on any wikipedia page. That said you also talked about how personal views are protected under Indian constitution. First of all, Wikipedia has nothing to do with the Indian constitution and more importantly the constitution does not guarantee hate speech.

I will revert back your edits unless you have a concrete answer. NerdboiIndia (talk) 18:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zepto (company) has been accepted

Zepto (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 13:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot🙏🏻 But can you explain me what does that *You can create article yourself meant*? Thanks a lot again🙏🏻 Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban Company has been accepted

Urban Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 13:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for deleting my edit in Bhavish Aggarwal. It was contentious and when I went back to check I realized it belonged in Ola Electric to which I moved it. (BTW, the reference is not self-published. New Atlas is a respected publisher of cutting edge tech subject matter.) Jojalozzo (talk) 23:12, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ilikeyoutoo yay. Thank you for your work on Urban Company. Another editor, TechnoSquirrel69, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. I've identified a couple of issues that need addressing for which I've added cleanup tags to being attention to. There is close paraphrasing of multiple sources which need to be rephrased in original terms — see the report. I also believe several of the cited sources are sponsored content posing as news coverage, which should generally be removed. {{subst:TS69/q|r}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TechnoSquirrel69}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for letting me know that, just want to make sure is the article still on the main space or is it removed? I will rephrase the wordings! Ilikeyoutoo yay! (talk) 05:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits on Bhavish Aggarwal on work life balance

Hi! I saw you recently removed my edits to the Bhavish Aggarwal page and was wondering if you could help me find out the parts that you think are biased and help me make it more neutral and less biased. I was also wondering what you mean by contentious, the news sources I cited all seemed to be saying the same thing. I have undone your edits. Please indicate the exact biases in reporting.

Thanks! NerdboiIndia (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that according to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, Wikipedia's job is not to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a tabloid to have each and every opinion of the subject on the page. Ilikeyoutoo yay! (talk) 11:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilikeyoutoo yay You are right, the same page also says, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source" As I have provided inline citations of not tabloids but news sources, everything said is factually correct and, in my opinion, presented as it is, without any bias. The points mentioned are not the views of the news article or my views, they are well established views of the subject. Being a CEO, it makes sense that his professional opinion finds a place on his page. Can you please point out why these particular points are removed and something like this, "Aggarwal was included in Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People of 2018. With a net worth of $2.3 billion, Aggarwal is one of the youngest self-made billionaires in the world." can stay on the page. Instead of removing the entire paragraph, I suggest you start by challenging each line and let me know which part exactly you feel is sensationalized. I am undoing your edits again. Your claim makes no sense whatsoever. NerdboiIndia (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swiggy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Ilikeyoutoo yay! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 14:05, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]