This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield
Article appears rather biased to news of food scares (which can be read about in the ext links), rather than giving the company history and brand history, which would be more encyclopaedic. Reference to Bourville village for workers and Quakers etc a bit thin. BulldozerD11 (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. Seems ridiculous that an article about an iconic brand such as Cadburys, with all its associate history, dedicates 50 percent of its space to recent food scares.
Nothing about the sponsoring of Coronation Street, a UK soap-opera? I mean, it lasted for what, ten years? Should be worth a least a sentence's mention.
86.163.78.6 (talk) 13:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]