Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epic duel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Epic duel: Reply |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game related deletion discussions]]. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 15:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game related deletion discussions]]. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 15:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' This article is very new, and is unfortunately being worked on by some very inexperienced users. The game itself is also less than a month old, with not a lot of material to write about. The fact that newer, inexperienced writers are mainly editing this article, and the fact that it is brand new means that there is not a lot of sources or material to be written. It might be more useful to wait a while, and make constructive edits or suggestions to the article instead of deleting it just because you don't like it.--<big>[[User:Jakkinx|<font color="red" face="blue">Jakkinx</font>]] [[User talk:Jakkinx|<font color="grey" face="grey">Talk to me!</font>]]</big> 02:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' This article is very new, and is unfortunately being worked on by some very inexperienced users. The game itself is also less than a month old, with not a lot of material to write about. The fact that newer, inexperienced writers are mainly editing this article, and the fact that it is brand new means that there is not a lot of sources or material to be written. It might be more useful to wait a while, and make constructive edits or suggestions to the article instead of deleting it just because you don't like it.--<big>[[User:Jakkinx|<font color="red" face="blue">Jakkinx</font>]] [[User talk:Jakkinx|<font color="grey" face="grey">Talk to me!</font>]]</big> 02:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Please don't misunderstand - I haven't nominated the article because ''"I don't like it"''. The main reason for nominating the article is ''because'' there simply isn't enough information about it for inclusion at the moment. As per EALacey, there seems to be only one news article about the game indicating it currently isn't notable enough. [[User:Phynicen| <b><font color="#9600a3">Phynicen</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Phynicen| <sup><b><font color="0031d0">"Chat"</font></b></sup>]] 13:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:59, 19 January 2010
- Epic duel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Epic duel is a new multi-player MMORPG game released on December 5, 2009. In my opinion, the game doesn't appear to be notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. The article itself is quite a mess and contains a lot of in-universe information. There are no references in the article either. Only two outbound links to the game's website, and the game's own MediaWiki. Phynicen "Chat" 12:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Google News Archive finds only one article, from a local newspaper. Seems not to meet our notability guideline for web content. EALacey (talk) 12:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per EALacey - so far not notable. Una LagunaTalk 14:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep This article is very new, and is unfortunately being worked on by some very inexperienced users. The game itself is also less than a month old, with not a lot of material to write about. The fact that newer, inexperienced writers are mainly editing this article, and the fact that it is brand new means that there is not a lot of sources or material to be written. It might be more useful to wait a while, and make constructive edits or suggestions to the article instead of deleting it just because you don't like it.--Jakkinx Talk to me! 02:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please don't misunderstand - I haven't nominated the article because "I don't like it". The main reason for nominating the article is because there simply isn't enough information about it for inclusion at the moment. As per EALacey, there seems to be only one news article about the game indicating it currently isn't notable enough. Phynicen "Chat" 13:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)