Jump to content

User talk:Phynicen: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 59: Line 59:


Could you explain why my edit constituted vandalism? It is a content dispute with a registered editor. One of us feels that the item needs to be included, the other feels that it shouldn't. Such a disagreement is never vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/83.80.18.68|83.80.18.68]] ([[User talk:83.80.18.68|talk]]) 15:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Could you explain why my edit constituted vandalism? It is a content dispute with a registered editor. One of us feels that the item needs to be included, the other feels that it shouldn't. Such a disagreement is never vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/83.80.18.68|83.80.18.68]] ([[User talk:83.80.18.68|talk]]) 15:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
:To explain, your removal of the entire passage was indeed vandalism. The intent on removing the information should have been discussed at [[Wikipedia_talk:ITN]] first to reach a consensus. You made no mention of your intention to remove the information. If you look at the edit history, you will see your edit has been reverted once more [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events/2010_January_17&action=history Portal:Current events/2010 January 17] and the page protected. Happy Editing. [[User:Phynicen| <b><font color="#9600a3">Phynicen</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Phynicen| <sup><b><font color="0031d0">"Chat"</font></b></sup>]] 17:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:10, 18 January 2010



Thanks

Thanks for arranging the Music section from Tomb Raider. I think the Film section should also be refreshed. As about Ailein Duinn, I know I'm right, on youtube and TR forums is the most common topic regarding the Legend's main theme. I think it was a mistake to sample that folk song from Spectrasonics, because it is very popular already, and mixing something popular with another popular thing will make people very confused, like a good versus remix. They are good, but they are odd. Troels says on an interview that he studied about world culture before composing on TR [1], but he uses many wrong combinations in Legend's music. I know it's hard work for a single man to deal with the entire score. That's why I made the table, now posted on List of List of Tomb Raider media, for seeing how much music he scored comparing to the other games. One more thing about Ailein Duinn, there is a woman crying and singing for her husband dead on sea. Where is that dead husband in the game. Is Lara crying for her husband in the game, is someone else doing this? Anyway, strange...

Please see also:

  • Tomb Raider: Legend - I recently found and written on the article that all voice samples are from Spectrasonics.
  • Ailein duinn - I found on the Interner more and more compositions featuring the Gaelic folk song, and I think I made that section a mess, hope someone will deal with that in the future.

--TudorTulok (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, hopefully we can raise the rating to a B. Once that's done, i'll see about trying to raise it to a Good Article. I'll check out those other articles too. I've checked some of the other articles to see if any references could be pulled. This worked for one or two, but for more of them a suitable reference just isn't available. This is why I have removed up to 3 passages that have been tagged [citation needed] for about 2 years, and left a note. Phynicen "Chat" 14:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit was not vandalism

Could you explain why my edit constituted vandalism? It is a content dispute with a registered editor. One of us feels that the item needs to be included, the other feels that it shouldn't. Such a disagreement is never vandalism. 83.80.18.68 (talk) 15:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To explain, your removal of the entire passage was indeed vandalism. The intent on removing the information should have been discussed at Wikipedia_talk:ITN first to reach a consensus. You made no mention of your intention to remove the information. If you look at the edit history, you will see your edit has been reverted once more Portal:Current events/2010 January 17 and the page protected. Happy Editing. Phynicen "Chat" 17:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]