Attention:
This WHOIS report. . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in theIf you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
}
September 2023
editHello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Man of Steel (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Armegon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Godzilla: King of the Monsters (2019 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Armegon (talk) 22:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Not to be rude but why do you keep changing it back? Even though Godzilla: King of the Monsters was not a big success, it was not a box office bomb like Mortal Engines. 23.241.136.211 (talk) 00:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Val Kilmer. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
edit You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Underworld: Evolution. Please see MOS:FILM, which says "Determine a consensus from objective (retrospective if possible) sources about how a film performed and why, but editors should not draw their own conclusions about the success or failure of the film.
" NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Titan A.E., you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
February 2024
editPlease stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Underworld: Awakening, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 04:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Heat (1995 film). Given the multiple warnings you've received in the past for adding unsourced material, it's distressing to see that you're continuing to engage in this behavior. This needs to stop. DonIago (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Your edits are currently under review. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --Picard's Facepalm • Made It So Engage! • 14:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Alexf(talk) 13:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
June 2024
editPlease stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Mummy Returns, you may be blocked from editing. The only information you added for which you provided a source was mentioned at that source as originating from IMDb, which is also unreliable per WP:RS/IMDb. More importantly, you've been warned repeatedly for adding unsourced information, and even blocked for doing so in the past. DonIago (talk) 17:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
July 2024
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Werewolf of Paris. Adakiko (talk) 00:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |