Talk:Circulation Verification Council
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bluerasberry in topic Third-party sources needed
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes. |
Third-party sources needed
editThe article I just created hardly indicates notability. However, I feel this article belongs on Wikipedia because some Wikipedia articles already reference this organization, and I feel that since the company is being used as a WP:RS then it merits an article. The data which CVC generates could verify the notability of many publications if CVC could be considered a reliable source, but CVC may well not be a reliable source. I cannot find a third-party review of them. Does anyone have third party data about this company? Blue Rasberry 03:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)