Biquaternion

In abstract algebra, the biquaternions are the numbers $w + x i + y j + z k$ , where $w, x, y$ , and $z$ are complex numbers, or variants thereof, and the elements of ${1, i, j, k}$ multiply as in the quaternion group and commute with their coefficients. There are three types of biquaternions corresponding to complex numbers and the variations thereof:

Biquaternions when the coefficients are complex numbers.
Split-biquaternions when the coefficients are split-complex numbers.
Dual quaternions when the coefficients are dual numbers.

This article is about the ordinary biquaternions named by William Rowan Hamilton in 1844.^[1] Some of the more prominent proponents of these biquaternions include Alexander Macfarlane, Arthur W. Conway, Ludwik Silberstein, and Cornelius Lanczos. As developed below, the unit quasi-sphere of the biquaternions provides a representation of the Lorentz group, which is the foundation of special relativity.

The algebra of biquaternions can be considered as a tensor product $C \otimes R H$ , where $C$ is the field of complex numbers and $H$ is the division algebra of (real) quaternions. In other words, the biquaternions are just the complexification of the quaternions. Viewed as a complex algebra, the biquaternions are isomorphic to the algebra of $2 \times 2$ complex matrices $M 2 (C)$ . They are also isomorphic to several Clifford algebras including $C \otimes R H = Cl [0] 3 (C) = Cl 2 (C) = Cl 1,2 (R)$ ,^[2] the Pauli algebra $Cl 3,0 (R)$ ,^[3]^[4] and the even part $Cl [0] 1,3 (R) = Cl [0] 3,1 (R)$ of the spacetime algebra.^[5]

Definition

Let ${1, i, j, k}$ be the basis for the (real) quaternions $H$ , and let $u, v, w, x$ be complex numbers, then

q=u\mathbf {1} +v\mathbf {i} +w\mathbf {j} +x\mathbf {k}

is a biquaternion.^[6] To distinguish square roots of minus one in the biquaternions, Hamilton^[7]^[8] and Arthur W. Conway used the convention of representing the square root of minus one in the scalar field $C$ by $h$ to avoid confusion with the $i$ in the quaternion group. Commutativity of the scalar field with the quaternion group is assumed:

h\mathbf {i} =\mathbf {i} h,\ \ h\mathbf {j} =\mathbf {j} h,\ \ h\mathbf {k} =\mathbf {k} h.

Hamilton introduced the terms bivector, biconjugate, bitensor, and biversor to extend notions used with real quaternions $H$ .

Hamilton's primary exposition on biquaternions came in 1853 in his Lectures on Quaternions. The editions of Elements of Quaternions, in 1866 by William Edwin Hamilton (son of Rowan), and in 1899, 1901 by Charles Jasper Joly, reduced the biquaternion coverage in favour of the real quaternions.

Considered with the operations of component-wise addition, and multiplication according to the quaternion group, this collection forms a 4-dimensional algebra over the complex numbers $C$ . The algebra of biquaternions is associative, but not commutative. A biquaternion is either a unit or a zero divisor. The algebra of biquaternions forms a composition algebra and can be constructed from bicomplex numbers. See § As a composition algebra below.

Place in ring theory

Linear representation

Note that the matrix product

{\begin{pmatrix}h&0\\0&-h\end{pmatrix}}{\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{pmatrix}}={\begin{pmatrix}0&h\\h&0\end{pmatrix}}

.

Because $h$ is the imaginary unit, each of these three arrays has a square equal to the negative of the identity matrix. When this matrix product is interpreted as $i j = k$ , then one obtains a subgroup of matrices that is isomorphic to the quaternion group. Consequently,

{\begin{pmatrix}u+hv&w+hx\\-w+hx&u-hv\end{pmatrix}}

represents biquaternion $q = u 1 + v i + w j + x k$ . Given any $2 \times 2$ complex matrix, there are complex values $u$ , $v$ , $w$ , and $x$ to put it in this form so that the matrix ring $M(2, C)$ is isomorphic^[9] to the biquaternion ring.

Subalgebras

Considering the biquaternion algebra over the scalar field of real numbers $R$ , the set

\{\mathbf {1} ,h,\mathbf {i} ,h\mathbf {i} ,\mathbf {j} ,h\mathbf {j} ,\mathbf {k} ,h\mathbf {k} \}

forms a basis so the algebra has eight real dimensions. The squares of the elements $h i, h j$ , and $h k$ are all positive one, for example, $(h i) 2 = h 2 i 2 = (- 1)(- 1) = + 1$ .

The subalgebra given by

\{x+y(h\mathbf {i} ):x,y\in \mathbb {R} \}

is ring isomorphic to the plane of split-complex numbers, which has an algebraic structure built upon the unit hyperbola. The elements $h j$ and $h k$ also determine such subalgebras.

Furthermore,

\{x+y\mathbf {j} :x,y\in \mathbb {C} \}

is a subalgebra isomorphic to the bicomplex numbers.

A third subalgebra called coquaternions is generated by $h j$ and $h k$ . It is seen that $(h j)(h k) = (- 1) i$ , and that the square of this element is $- 1$ . These elements generate the dihedral group of the square. The linear subspace with basis ${1, i, h j, h k}$ thus is closed under multiplication, and forms the coquaternion algebra.

In the context of quantum mechanics and spinor algebra, the biquaternions $h i, h j$ , and $h k$ (or their negatives), viewed in the $M 2 (C)$ representation, are called Pauli matrices.

Algebraic properties

The biquaternions have two conjugations:

the biconjugate or biscalar minus bivector is $q^{*}=w-x\mathbf {i} -y\mathbf {j} -z\mathbf {k} \!\ ,$ and
the complex conjugation of biquaternion coefficients ${\bar {q}}={\bar {w}}+{\bar {x}}\mathbf {i} +{\bar {y}}\mathbf {j} +{\bar {z}}\mathbf {k}$

where ${\bar {z}}=a-bh$ when $z=a+bh,\quad a,b\in \mathbb {R} ,\quad h^{2}=-\mathbf {1} .$

Note that $(pq)^{*}=q^{*}p^{*},\quad {\overline {pq}}={\bar {p}}{\bar {q}},\quad {\overline {q^{*}}}={\bar {q}}^{*}.$

Clearly, if $qq^{*}=0$ then $q$ is a zero divisor. Otherwise $\lbrace qq^{*}\rbrace ^{-\mathbf {1} }$ is a complex number. Further, $qq^{*}=q^{*}q$ is easily verified. This allows the inverse to be defined by

$q^{-1}=q^{*}\lbrace qq^{*}\rbrace ^{-1}$ , if $qq^{*}\neq 0.$

Relation to Lorentz transformations

Consider now the linear subspace^[10]

M=\lbrace q\colon q^{*}={\bar {q}}\rbrace =\lbrace t+x(h\mathbf {i} )+y(h\mathbf {j} )+z(h\mathbf {k} )\colon t,x,y,z\in \mathbb {R} \rbrace .

$M$ is not a subalgebra since it is not closed under products; for example $(h\mathbf {i} )(h\mathbf {j} )=h^{2}\mathbf {ij} =-\mathbf {k} \notin M.$ Indeed, $M$ cannot form an algebra if it is not even a magma.

Proposition: If $q$ is in $M$ , then $qq^{*}=t^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}.$

Proof: From the definitions,

{\begin{aligned}qq^{*}&=(t+xh\mathbf {i} +yh\mathbf {j} +zh\mathbf {k} )(t-xh\mathbf {i} -yh\mathbf {j} -zh\mathbf {k} )\\&=t^{2}-x^{2}(h\mathbf {i} )^{2}-y^{2}(h\mathbf {j} )^{2}-z^{2}(h\mathbf {k} )^{2}\\&=t^{2}-x^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}.\end{aligned}}

Definition: Let biquaternion $g$ satisfy $gg^{*}=1.$ Then the Lorentz transformation associated with $g$ is given by

T(q)=g^{*}q{\bar {g}}.

Proposition: If $q$ is in $M$ , then $T (q)$ is also in $M$ .

Proof: $(g^{*}q{\bar {g}})^{*}={\bar {g}}^{*}q^{*}g={\overline {g^{*}}}{\bar {q}}g={\overline {g^{*}q{\bar {g}})}}.$

Proposition: $\quad T(q)(T(q))^{*}=qq^{*}$

Proof: Note first that gg* = 1 implies that the sum of the squares of its four complex components is one. Then the sum of the squares of the complex conjugates of these components is also one. Therefore, ${\bar {g}}({\bar {g}})^{*}=1.$ Now

(g^{*}q{\bar {g}})(g^{*}q{\bar {g}})^{*}=g^{*}q({\bar {g}}{\bar {g}}^{*})q^{*}g=g^{*}qq^{*}g=qq^{*}.

Associated terminology

As the biquaternions have been a fixture of linear algebra since the beginnings of mathematical physics, there is an array of concepts that are illustrated or represented by biquaternion algebra. The transformation group $G=\lbrace g:gg^{*}=1\rbrace$ has two parts, $G\cap H$ and $G\cap M.$ The first part is characterized by $g={\bar {g}}$ ; then the Lorentz transformation corresponding to $g$ is given by $T(q)=g^{-1}qg$ since $g^{*}=g^{-1}.$ Such a transformation is a rotation by quaternion multiplication, and the collection of them is $SO(3)$ $\cong G\cap H.$ But this subgroup of $G$ is not a normal subgroup, so no quotient group can be formed.

To view $G\cap M$ it is necessary to show some subalgebra structure in the biquaternions. Let $r$ represent an element of the sphere of square roots of minus one in the real quaternion subalgebra $H$ . Then $(hr) 2 = +1$ and the plane of biquaternions given by $D_{r}=\lbrace z=x+yhr:x,y\in \mathbb {R} \rbrace$ is a commutative subalgebra isomorphic to the plane of split-complex numbers. Just as the ordinary complex plane has a unit circle, $D_{r}$ has a unit hyperbola given by

\exp(ahr)=\cosh(a)+hr\ \sinh(a),\quad a\in R.

Just as the unit circle turns by multiplication through one of its elements, so the hyperbola turns because $\exp(ahr)\exp(bhr)=\exp((a+b)hr).$ Hence these algebraic operators on the hyperbola are called hyperbolic versors. The unit circle in $C$ and unit hyperbola in $D r$ are examples of one-parameter groups. For every square root $r$ of minus one in $H$ , there is a one-parameter group in the biquaternions given by $G\cap D_{r}.$

The space of biquaternions has a natural topology through the Euclidean metric on $8$ -space. With respect to this topology, $G$ is a topological group. Moreover, it has analytic structure making it a six-parameter Lie group. Consider the subspace of bivectors $A=\lbrace q:q^{*}=-q\rbrace$ . Then the exponential map $\exp :A\to G$ takes the real vectors to $G\cap H$ and the $h$ -vectors to $G\cap M.$ When equipped with the commutator, $A$ forms the Lie algebra of $G$ . Thus this study of a six-dimensional space serves to introduce the general concepts of Lie theory. When viewed in the matrix representation, $G$ is called the special linear group $SL(2,C)$ in $M(2, C)$ .

Many of the concepts of special relativity are illustrated through the biquaternion structures laid out. The subspace $M$ corresponds to Minkowski space, with the four coordinates giving the time and space locations of events in a resting frame of reference. Any hyperbolic versor $exp(ahr)$ corresponds to a velocity in direction $r$ of speed $c tanh a$ where $c$ is the velocity of light. The inertial frame of reference of this velocity can be made the resting frame by applying the Lorentz boost $T$ given by $g = exp(0.5 ahr)$ since then $g^{\star }=\exp(-0.5ahr)=g^{*}$ so that $T(\exp(ahr))=1.$ Naturally the hyperboloid $G\cap M,$ which represents the range of velocities for sub-luminal motion, is of physical interest. There has been considerable work associating this "velocity space" with the hyperboloid model of hyperbolic geometry. In special relativity, the hyperbolic angle parameter of a hyperbolic versor is called rapidity. Thus we see the biquaternion group $G$ provides a group representation for the Lorentz group.^[11]

After the introduction of spinor theory, particularly in the hands of Wolfgang Pauli and Élie Cartan, the biquaternion representation of the Lorentz group was superseded. The new methods were founded on basis vectors in the set

\{q\ :\ qq^{*}=0\}=\left\{w+x\mathbf {i} +y\mathbf {j} +z\mathbf {k} \ :\ w^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=0\right\}

which is called the complex light cone. The above representation of the Lorentz group coincides with what physicists refer to as four-vectors. Beyond four-vectors, the standard model of particle physics also includes other Lorentz representations, known as scalars, and the $(1, 0) \oplus (0, 1)$ -representation associated with e.g. the electromagnetic field tensor. Furthermore, particle physics makes use of the $SL(2, C)$ representations (or projective representations of the Lorentz group) known as left- and right-handed Weyl spinors, Majorana spinors, and Dirac spinors. It is known that each of these seven representations can be constructed as invariant subspaces within the biquaternions.^[12]

As a composition algebra

Although W. R. Hamilton introduced biquaternions in the 19th century, its delineation of its mathematical structure as a special type of algebra over a field was accomplished in the 20th century: the biquaternions may be generated out of the bicomplex numbers in the same way that Adrian Albert generated the real quaternions out of complex numbers in the so-called Cayley–Dickson construction. In this construction, a bicomplex number $(w, z)$ has conjugate $(w, z)* = (w, - z)$ .

The biquaternion is then a pair of bicomplex numbers $(a, b)$ , where the product with a second biquaternion $(c, d)$ is

(a,b)(c,d)=(ac-d^{*}b,da+bc^{*}).

If $a=(u,v),b=(w,z),$ then the biconjugate $(a,b)^{*}=(a^{*},-b).$

When $(a, b)*$ is written as a 4-vector of ordinary complex numbers,

(u,v,w,z)^{*}=(u,-v,-w,-z).

The biquaternions form an example of a quaternion algebra, and it has norm

N(u,v,w,z)=u^{2}+v^{2}+w^{2}+z^{2}.

Two biquaternions $p$ and $q$ satisfy $N (pq) = N (p) N (q)$ , indicating that $N$ is a quadratic form admitting composition, so that the biquaternions form a composition algebra.

Citations

^ Hamilton 1850.
^ Garling 2011, pp. 112, 113.
^ Garling 2011, p. 112.
^ Francis & Kosowsky 2005, p. 404.
^ Francis & Kosowsky 2005, p. 386.
^ Hamilton 1853, p. 639.
^ Hamilton 1853, p. 730.
^ Hamilton 1866, p. 289.
^ Dickson 1914, p. 13.
^ Lanczos 1949, See equation 94.16, page 305. The following algebra compares to Lanczos, except he uses ~ to signify quaternion conjugation and * for complex conjugation.
^ Hermann 1974, chapter 6.4 Complex Quaternions and Maxwell's Equations.
^ Furey 2012.

References

Arthur Buchheim (1885) "A Memoir on biquaternions", American Journal of Mathematics 7(4):293 to 326 from Jstor early content.
Conway, Arthur W. (1911), "On the application of quaternions to some recent developments in electrical theory", Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 29A: 1–9.
Dickson, Leonard (1914), Linear Algebras, §13 "Equivalence of the complex quaternion and matric algebras" via HathiTrust
Furey, C. (2012). "Unified Theory of Ideals". Phys. Rev. D. 86 (2): 025024. arXiv:1002.1497. Bibcode:2012PhRvD..86b5024F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.025024. S2CID 118458623.
Francis; Kosowsky (2005), "The construction of spinors in geometric algebra", Annals of Physics, 317 (2): 317, 384–409, arXiv:math-ph/0403040, Bibcode:2005AnPhy.317..383F, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.11.008, S2CID 119632876
Garling, D. J. H. (2011), Clifford Algebras: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press
Girard, P. R. (1984), "The quaternion group and modern physics", European Journal of Physics, 5 (1): 25–32, Bibcode:1984EJPh....5...25G, doi:10.1088/0143-0807/5/1/007, S2CID 250775753
Hamilton, Willian R. (1850), "On Geometrical Interpretation of Some Results obtained by Calculation with Biquaternions", Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 5: 388
Hamilton, William Rowan (1853), Lectures on Quaternions, Article 669, Hodges and Smith; [etc., etc.]
Hamilton, William Rowan (1866), Hamilton, William Edwin (ed.), Elements of Quaternions (1st ed.), Longmans, Green & Co.
Hamilton, William Rowan (1899), Joly, Jasper Joly (ed.), Elements of Quaternions, vol. I (2nd ed.), Longmans, Green & Co.
Hamilton, William Rowan (1901), Joly, Jasper Joly (ed.), Elements of Quaternions, vol. II (2nd ed.), Longmans, Green & Co.
Hermann, Robert (1974), Spinors, Clifford and Cayley Algebras, Interdisciplinary Mathematics, vol. VII, Math Sci Press, pp. 250–265, ISBN 0-915692-06-6
Kilmister, C. W. (1994), Eddington's search for a fundamental theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 121, 122, 179, 180, ISBN 978-0-521-37165-0
Kravchenko, Vladislav (2003), Applied Quaternionic Analysis, Heldermann Verlag, ISBN 3-88538-228-8
Lanczos, Cornelius (1949), The Variational Principles of Mechanics, University of Toronto Press, pp. 304–312
Silberstein, Ludwik (1912), "Quaternionic form of relativity", Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, 23 (137): 790–809, doi:10.1080/14786440508637276
Silberstein, Ludwik (1914), The Theory of Relativity
Synge, J. L. (1972), "Quaternions, Lorentz transformations, and the Conway-Dirac-Eddington matrices", Communications of the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Series A, 21
Sangwine, Stephen J.; Ell, Todd A.; Le Bihan, Nicolas (2010), "Fundamental representations and algebraic properties of biquaternions or complexified quaternions", Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 21 (3): 1–30, arXiv:1001.0240, doi:10.1007/s00006-010-0263-3, S2CID 54729224
Sangwine, Stephen J.; Alfsmann, Daniel (2010), "Determination of the biquaternion divisors of zero, including idempotents and nilpotents", Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 20 (2): 401–410, arXiv:0812.1102, Bibcode:2008arXiv0812.1102S, doi:10.1007/s00006-010-0202-3, S2CID 14246706
Tanişli, M. (2006), "Gauge transformation and electromagnetism with biquaternions", Europhysics Letters, 74 (4): 569, Bibcode:2006EL.....74..569T, doi:10.1209/epl/i2005-10571-6, S2CID 250862773

[FOOTNOTEHamilton1850-1] Hamilton 1850.

[FOOTNOTEGarling2011112,_113-2] Garling 2011, pp. 112, 113.

[FOOTNOTEGarling2011112-3] Garling 2011, p. 112.

[FOOTNOTEFrancisKosowsky2005404-4] Francis & Kosowsky 2005, p. 404.

[FOOTNOTEFrancisKosowsky2005386-5] Francis & Kosowsky 2005, p. 386.

[FOOTNOTEHamilton1853639-6] Hamilton 1853, p. 639.

[FOOTNOTEHamilton1853730-7] Hamilton 1853, p. 730.

[FOOTNOTEHamilton1866289-8] Hamilton 1866, p. 289.

[FOOTNOTEDickson191413-9] Dickson 1914, p. 13.

[FOOTNOTELanczos1949See_equation_94.16,_page_305._The_following_algebra_compares_to_Lanczos,_except_he_uses_~_to_signify_quaternion_conjugation_and_*_for_complex_conjugation-10] Lanczos 1949, See equation 94.16, page 305. The following algebra compares to Lanczos, except he uses ~ to signify quaternion conjugation and * for complex conjugation.

[FOOTNOTEHermann1974chapter_6.4_Complex_Quaternions_and_Maxwell's_Equations-11] Hermann 1974, chapter 6.4 Complex Quaternions and Maxwell's Equations.

[FOOTNOTEFurey2012-12] Furey 2012.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]