Content deleted Content added
Dr. Blofeld (talk | contribs) |
John Carter (talk | contribs) →Wikidata: response Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 633:
Hi John, hope you're well. Well I'm of the opinion that if there's sources we should have articles on as many church buildings as possible however local. Certainly if it's a listed building, Grade II or not, it should be mentioned somewhere. Wikidata should try to register as many public buildings as possible I think.♦ [[User:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 19:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
::I think the big issue here is maybe [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]]. I know of at least a few real directories on churches and other topics which provide minimal information on topics that might not be enough to establish general notability, and the really short sections of basically minimal data in guides like Lonely Planet tend to be found insufficient to establish notability here. The same might be said for works like the topical Marquis Who's Who works. But if nothing else if we had some people working to develop wikidata pieces on articles deleted here that have verifiable information, that still preserves that minimal data. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
|