Content deleted Content added
The (most) associated scientific field of Astrobiology is now linked to in the header, and the specific examples of mars have been separated from the more generalised writings. |
a perhaps more controversial deletion of a section on life on Mars that was way too specific, separated for easy reversal... |
||
Line 58:
No single compound will prove life once existed. Rather, it will be distinctive patterns present in any organic compounds showing a process of selection.<ref name="PhysOrg Cousins 2018">{{cite news |url=https://phys.org/news/2018-01-rover-life-mars-proveit.html |title=Rover could discover life on Mars – here's what it would take to prove it |first=Claire |last=Cousins |work=PhysOrg |date=5 January 2018}}</ref> For example, [[membrane lipid]]s left behind by degraded cells will be concentrated, have a limited size range, and comprise an even number of carbons. Similarly, life only uses left-handed amino acids.<ref name="PhysOrg Cousins 2018" /> Biosignatures need not be chemical, however, and can also be suggested by a distinctive [[magnetic]] biosignature.<ref name="Wall-20111213">{{cite news|url=https://www.space.com/13911-mars-life-search-magnetic-signatures.html|title=Mars Life Hunt Could Look for Magnetic Clues |last=Wall|first=Mike |date=13 December 2011|work=[[Space.com]]|access-date=2011-12-15}}</ref>
[[File:Biomarkers (petroleum).png|thumb|upright|Structures of prime examples of biomarkers (petroleum), from top to bottom: Pristane, Triterpane, Sterane, Phytane and Porphyrin]]
|