Ernst & Young: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
BunnysBot (talk | contribs)
m Fix CW Errors with GenFixes (T1)
Audit practices: Changed to "alleged". Shortened.
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 38:
}}
 
'''Ernst & Young Global Limited''', [[trading as]] '''EY''',<ref name="rebranding"/><ref name="rebranding2"/> is a [[multinational corporation|multinational]] [[professional services]] [[partnership]]. EY is one of the largest [[professional services network]]s in the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=97518|title=Professional Services Company Overview of Ernst & Young LLP|website=bloomberg.com|access-date=2019-04-12}}</ref> Along with [[Deloitte]], [[KPMG]] and [[PwC]], it is one of the [[Big Four accounting firms|Big Four]] accounting firms. It primarily provides [[assurance services|assurance]], [[tax]], [[Information technology|information technology services]] (including [[managed services]] in areas like [[Cybersecurity]], [[Cloud computing|Cloud]], [[Digital transformation|Digital Transformation]] and [[Artificial intelligence|AI]]), [[management consulting|consulting]], and [[Corporate services|advisory]] services to its clients.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ey.com/UK/en/Newsroom/Facts-and-figures|title=EY at a glance|publisher=EY|access-date=2013-07-03}}</ref>
 
EY operates as a network of member firms which are structured as separate legal entities in a partnership, which has 395,442 employees in over 700 offices in more than 150 countries.<ref name="headcount_2023">{{cite web|url=https://www.ey.com/en_gl/news/2023/09/ey-reports-record-global-revenue-results-of-just-under-us-50b|title=EY reports record global revenue results of just under US$50b|date=13 September 2023|website=ey.com|access-date=13 September 2023}}</ref> The firm's current partnership was formed in 1989 by a merger of two accounting firms;: Ernst & Whinney and Arthur Young & Co.<ref>{{cite web |title=A timeline of our history |url=https://www.ey.com/gl/en/about-us/our-people-and-culture/our-history/about-ey---key-facts-and-figures---history---timeline |access-date=2016-09-24 |publisher=EY |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160927092457/https://www.ey.com/gl/en/about-us/our-people-and-culture/our-history/about-ey---key-facts-and-figures---history---timeline |archive-date=27 September 2016 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> It was named Ernst & Young until a rebranding campaign officially changed its name to EY in 2013,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/financial-services/ernst-young-re-brands-1.1449229|title=Ernst & Young re-brands|last=Reddan|first=Fiona|date=2013-07-01|newspaper=[[The Irish Times]]|access-date=2013-07-03|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130702220058/https://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/financial-services/ernst-young-re-brands-1.1449229|archive-date=2 July 2013}}</ref> although this initialism was already used informally prior to its sanctioning adoption.
 
In 20192023, EY was the seventh-largest [[Privately held company|privately owned organization]] in the world.,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.valuewalk.com/top-10-largest-private-companies-revenue/|title=Top Ten Largest Private Companies in the World|date=25 April 2023|work=Forbes|access-date=8 February 2024}}</ref> {{as of|2023|post=,}}and EY has continuouslyfor 25 years been continuously ranked on [[Fortune (magazine)|''Fortune'']] magazine's list of the [[100 Best Companies to Work For]] over 25 years, longer than any other accounting firm.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://fortune.com/best-companies/2019/ernst-young/|title=Fortune Magazine 2019 100 Best Companies to Work For|work=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]|access-date=12 December 2019|archive-date=8 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220408182711/https://fortune.com/best-companies/2019/ernst-young/|url-status=dead}}</ref> The firm has, however, repeatedly come under scrutiny for systemic issues in their training, hiring, and work culture.
 
== History ==
Line 56:
In October 1997, Ernst & Young announced plans to merge its global practices with professional services network [[KPMG]], to create the largest professional services organization in the world. The announcement came on the heels of an announced merger between [[Price Waterhouse]] and [[Coopers & Lybrand]] only a month earlier. These plans were soon abandoned in February 1998, due to several factors ranging from client opposition, antitrust issues, cost problems, and the anticipated difficulty of merging the two diverse firms and cultures.<ref>[https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/56509.stm "Accountancy Merger Off"]. [[BBC News]]. 23 February 1998. Retrieved 9 July 2011.</ref> The merger between Price Waterhouse and Coopers & Lybrand, however, went ahead as planned, creating [[PwC]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/Company-history/Chronology-14.aspx |title=Chronology |access-date=27 September 2010 |publisher=PricewaterhouseCoopers |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101010183230/https://www.ukmediacentre.pwc.com/Company-history/Chronology-14.aspx |archive-date=10 October 2010 }}</ref>
 
Ernst & Young expanded its consulting practice heavily during the 1980s and 1990s. During this time, the [[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]], and various members of the investment community, began to raise concerns about a potential conflict of interests. This conflict would be brought about by firms offering both consulting and auditing services simultaneously to overlapping clients, a common practice among the "Big Five". In May 2000, Ernst & Young was the first of those firms to fully separate its consulting practices via a sale to the French IT services company [[Capgemini]] for $11&nbsp;billion, creating the new company Capgemini Ernst & Young, which was later renamed back to [[Capgemini]].<ref>[https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9503E6D81339F932A35750C0A9669C8B63 "Capgemini to Acquire Ernst & Young Consulting Business"]. ''[[The New York Times]]''. March 2000.</ref>
 
=== Recent history, re-branding and expansion ===
Line 207:
 
In April 2023, the German Abschlussprüferaufsichtstelle (APAS) (the federal watchdog, responsible for the oversight on auditors) assessed, that EY has committed violations of duty on its Wirecard mandate and prohibited the company for two years to accept new audit mandates for companies at the German stock exchange.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Bender |first1=René |last2=Fröndhoff |first2=Bert |last3=Greive |first3=Martin |last4=Votsmeier |first4=Volker |date=2023-04-03 |title=Wirecard-Skandal: EY darf zwei Jahre keine neuen Prüfungsmandate bei Börsenkonzernen übernehmen |trans-title=EY is not allowed to take on new audit mandates at stock exchange groups for two years |url=https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/dienstleister/wirecard-skandal-ey-darf-zwei-jahre-keine-neuen-pruefungsmandate-bei-boersenkonzernen-uebernehmen/29071046.html |access-date=2023-04-03 |website=www.handelsblatt.com |language=de}}</ref>
 
In December 2024, a lawsuit was filed against EY accusing it of assisting the UAE-based Brooge Petroleum and Gas Investment Company FZE in defrauding investors during a 2019 [[special-purpose acquisition company]] (SPAC) merger. It alleges that Brooge fabricated financial data through fake invoices, customers and affiliated parties and forged 30-80% of its revenues between 2018 and 2020. EY allegedly supported Brooge’s scheme by “issuing unqualified audit opinions”. The lawsuit was filed by a group of Boorge Energy shareholders, who accused EY of fraud and violations of the [[Securities Exchange Act of 1934]]. The plaintiffs were seeking damages, interest, and legal fees.<ref>{{cite news|last=Pazanowski |first=Bernie |title=Ernst & Young Accused of Helping Brooge Defraud SPAC Investors |date=18 December 2024 |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/ernst-young-accused-of-helping-brooge-defraud-spac-investors |website=Bloomberg Law |access-date=1 January 2025}}</ref> <ref>{{cite news|last1=Smith |first1=Robert |last2=Kissin |first2=Ellesheva |title=Ernst & Young Accused of Helping Brooge Defraud SPAC Investors |date=23 December 2024 |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/ernst-young-accused-of-helping-brooge-defraud-spac-investors |website=Financial Times |access-date=1 January 2025}}</ref>
 
===Exam cheating by audit professionals===
Line 222 ⟶ 224:
In 2014, tax arrangements negotiated by EY for [[The Walt Disney Company]], [[Koch Industries]], [[Skype]], and other [[multinational corporation]]s became public in the so-called ''[[Luxembourg Leaks]]''. The disclosure of these and other tax arrangements led to controversial discussions about [[tax avoidance]].<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/dec/09/-sp-luxembourg-tax-files-how-junckers-duchy-accommodated-skype-and-the-koch-empire|title=Luxembourg tax files: how Juncker's duchy accommodated Skype and the Koch empire|date=9 December 2014|access-date=17 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/business/disney-and-koch-industries-had-luxembourg-tax-deals-journalists-group-says.html?_r=0|title=Disney and Koch Industries Had Luxembourg Tax Deals, Journalists' Group Says|date=10 December 2014|access-date=17 December 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Irish Times|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/koch-industries-implicated-in-luxembourg-leaks-1.2031660|title=Koch Industries implicated in Luxembourg leaks|date=10 December 2014|access-date=17 December 2014}}</ref>
 
In 2015, EY's member firm in Japan, Ernst & Young ShinNihon, was fined {{JPY|2.1 billion}} ({{USD|17.4 million}}) for failing to spot irregularities duringsince audit2008 ofwhile auditing its client [[Toshiba]], which was Japan's worst accounting scandal in years. The firm was also suspended from taking up new business for three months. An official from Japan's [[Financial Services Agency]] (FSA) described that "there was a grave breach of duty". The firm's CEO and chairman, Koichi Hanabusa stepped down the following month to take responsibility and monthly salaries for 19 employees were cut from 20 per cent to 50 per cent.<ref name=ReutersToshiba>{{cite news|last1=Uranaka|first1=Taiga|last2=Wada|first2=Takahiko|title=Japan fines Ernst & Young affiliate $17.4 million over Toshiba audit|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-toshiba-accounting-ernst-idUSKBN0U505S20151222|access-date=29 December 2016|work=Reuters|date=22 December 2015}}</ref><ref name=FTShinNihon>{{cite news|last1=Inagaki|first1=Kana|title=EY's Japanese unit reprimanded by regulator over Toshiba audits|url=https://www.ft.com/content/e6357710-a89a-11e5-955c-1e1d6de94879 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/e6357710-a89a-11e5-955c-1e1d6de94879 |archive-date=10 December 2022|access-date=29 December 2016|work=The Financial Times|date=22 December 2015|url-access=subscription}}</ref> In an unusual move, the FSA publicly named seven accountants involved in the audit who were saidaccused of failing to exercise due caution and signing off on false financial documents.<ref name=FTShinNihon/> The FSA also said the "firm’s operations were deeply improper".<ref name=FTShinNihon/> ShinNihon, at the time, was Japan's biggest accounting firm, with about 3,500 certified accountants and more than 4,000 clients.<ref name=ReutersToshiba/> Ernst & Young ShinNihon audited about 960 listed companies in Japan, the most among the [[Big Four accounting firms|Big Four]], as reported in 2015.<ref name=NikkeiEYSN>{{cite news|title=Top accounting firms eyed to replace auditor|url=https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Top-accounting-firms-eyed-to-replace-auditor|access-date=6 May 2017|work=Nikkei Asian Review|date=12 December 2015}}</ref> Ernst & Young ShinNihon had audited Toshiba for over 60 years and the firm had around 70 staff serving Toshiba before the accounting scandal broke.<ref name=NikkeiEYSN/>
 
In 2017, Ernst & Young Baltic, member of the EY network, usedwas accused of using the emission assumptions of highly polluting EURO II trucks (manufactured before 2001) to falsely increase the socio-economic benefits of the new railway for the period 2026–2055 by 3 billion euros in the [[Rail Baltica]] Cost-Benefit Analysis. TotalThe total mistakes amountamounted to more than 4 billion euros thatand constituteconstituted 20% of the total socio-economic benefitsbenefit of the Rail Baltica.<ref>{{cite book |date=2018 |title=Major mistakes in Rail Baltica Cost-Benefit Analysis made by Ernst & Young Baltic |isbn=978-1985198630 |url=https://avalikultrailbalticust.ee/PDF/ARB_MMistakesRB_CBA_by_EY.pdf |last1=Humal |first1=Priit |last2=Lambot |first2=Karli |last3=Paul |first3=Illimar |publisher=CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180128041756/https://avalikultrailbalticust.ee/PDF/ARB_MMistakesRB_CBA_by_EY.pdf |archive-date=2018-01-28 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Correction of the mistakes makesmade the project unfeasible. EY has refused to provide any comments to the media regarding the public accusations.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://jv.err.ee/arhiiv/2017-000010-0918_0001_XHD_AKTUAALNE-KAAMERA.mp4#t=820 |title=Estonian Public Broadcasting News 18 September 2017 |access-date=12 March 2018 |archive-date=13 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180313093908/https://jv.err.ee/arhiiv/2017-000010-0918_0001_XHD_AKTUAALNE-KAAMERA.mp4#t=820 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
 
== Controversies ==
=== Sexist training program ===
In October 2019, ''[[HuffPost]]'' broke a story about a New Jersey "Power-Presence-Purpose" training seminar purportedly to empower female employees, but which was, as characterized by ''HuffPost'', "full of out of touch advice".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Peck |first1=Emily |title=Women At Ernst & Young Instructed On How To Dress, Act Nicely Around Men |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/women-ernst-young-how-to-dress-act-around-men_n_5da721eee4b002e33e78606a |access-date=17 March 2023 |work=HuffPost |date=21 October 2019 |language=en}}</ref> Women were told to concentrate on their appearance, not to show too much skin, and not to speak too much. One participant said it was basically a "women bashing" exercise. "You have to offer your thoughts in a benign way...You have to be the perfect [[Stepford wife]]... It felt like they were being turned into someone who is super-smiley, who never confronts anyone" she said.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/women-ernst-young-how-to-dress-act-around-men_n_5da721eee4b002e33e78606a|title=Women at Ernst & Young Instructed on How To Dress, Act Nicely Around Men|last=Peck|first=Emily|date=2019-10-21|work=Huffington Post|access-date=2019-10-22|language=en-AU}}</ref> In 2021, EY agreed to pay the state of New Jersey $100,000 and set up a $500,000 scholarship following its investigation of the sexistprogram "Power-Presence-Purpose"to trainingresolve programclaims EY broke state law against discrimination.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nj.com/hudson/2021/06/ey-reaches-deal-with-state-over-sexist-training-video-for-female-employees.html |title=EY reaches deal with state over sexist training video for female employees |publisher=nj.com |date=2021-06-02 |accessdate=2022-06-29}}</ref>
 
=== Working rights ===
Line 235 ⟶ 237:
===Elizabeth Broderick & Co. Culture Review===
 
In July 2023, an independent culture review by the former Australian sex discrimination commissioner [[Elizabeth Broderick]] was released after being commissioned by EY following the suicide of an auditor in the Sydney office in August 2022. Over 4,500 participants from the Australian and New Zealand EY offices participated through online surveys, interviews, written submissions, and group listening sessions. The report revealed that 15% of EY employees have experienced instances of either bullying, sexual harassment, or racism. The report also detailed the long working hours, with approximately two in five employees considering quitting due to long work hours and 46% of respondents reporting that their health has been negatively affected due to the long hours. The culture review revealed that over 31% of EY employees worked over 51 hours per week routinely, and 11% of EY employees working over 61 hours per week routinely. EY intends to respond to all 27 recommendations outlined in Elizabeth Broderick & Co.'s report.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ey.com/en_au/elizabeth-broderick-and-co-independent-review-into-workplace-culture-at-ey|title=Elizabeth Broderick & Co. independent review into workplace culture at EY|publisher=ey.com|date=27 July 2023|access-date=August 5, 2023}}</ref>
 
In April 2024, EY apologized for its workplace culture and said it has started a "time-owed-in-lieu pilot" and is "making strong progress" on other report recommendations.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wilson |first=Nick |date=2024-04-22 |title=EY apologises for workplace culture following Senate grilling |url=https://www.accountingtimes.com.au/profession/were-selling-time-professional-services-and-overwork-culture |access-date=2024-12-31 |website=www.accountingtimes.com.au |language=en-gb}}</ref>
 
===Death of Anna Sebastian Perayil ===
 
Anna Sebastian Perayil, a 26-year -old [[Chartered Accountantaccountant (CAIndia)|chartered from Keralaaccountant]], had started workingdied in theJuly Pune2024, officefour Ernstmonths &after Youngstarting (EY)work onat 18the MarchPune, 2024India, butEY heroffice. prematureHer deathfamily withinalleged fourthat monthsher ondeath 20 July 2024,was due to stress caused by overwork, [[presenteeism]] and exhaustion. has re-ignitedHer thedeath led to nationwide outrage and debate abouton [[Toxic workplace|toxic work culture]] in India.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://english.jagran.com/viral/after-ey-pune-ca-death-mnc-employee-x-post-on-working-17-to-18-hours-attending-5-am-meeting-draws-reaction-10188665 |title=After EY Pune CA Death, MNC Employee's X Post On Working 17 To 18 Hours, Attending 5 AM Meeting Draws Reaction |publisher=Jagran |date=2024-09-19 |access-date=2024-09-19}}</ref><ref>{{citeCite news |date=2024-09-18 |title=Grieving mom's heart-wrenching letter blames toxic culture for daughter’s death web|url=https://wwwtimesofindia.msnindiatimes.com/enlife-instyle/newsrelationships/otherwork/grieving-mom-smoms-heart-wrenching-letter-blamesto-ey-india-chairman-blaming-toxic-culture-for-daughter-sdaughters-death/ar-AA1qL1vmarticleshow/113450405.cms |access-date=18 September 2024-12-30 |titlework=GrievingThe mom'sTimes heart-wrenching letter blames toxic culture for daughter's deathof India |websiteissn=[[MSN]] |access0971-date=18 September 20248257}}</ref>
 
The [[Indian Government]] has launched a probe into EY work culture and MoS [[Shobha Karandlaje]], the Minister of State for the [[Ministry of Labour and Employment, (India)|Ministry of Micro, SmallLabour and Medium Enterprises hasEmployment]], said in a post on [[X Twitter|X]] that her ministry has officially taken up the complaint. Other political leaders like the Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister [[Ajit Pawar]] and BJP[[Bharatiya Janata Party]] leader [[Rajeev Chandrasekhar]], have expressed sadness whileand seekingsupport for a probe into her family's allegations of an exploitative work environment at Ernst and Young India.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/centre-probing-ernst-and-young-pune-woman-death-mother-work-pressure-2602594-2024-09-19 |title=Government probing EY India employee's death due to 'excessive workload'|publisher=Indiatoday |date=2024-09-19 |access-date=2024-09-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.freepressjournal.in/pune/ajit-pawar-on-ey-pune-employees-death-rising-cases-of-young-people-dying-from-stress-need-our-attention |title=Ajit Pawar On EY Pune Employee's Death: 'Rising Cases Of Young People Dying From Stress Need Our Attention |publisher=Freepressjournal |date=2024-09-19 |access-date=2024-09-19}}</ref>
 
== Sponsorships ==