Monthly Archives: November 2007

Posada stays with the Yankees

Details: Jorge Posada signs a four-year, $52.4m deal to stay with the Yankees.

Optimist’s argument: Unthinkable for him to be in another uniform, Posada has had a great career with the Yankees and his 2007 performance showed that he’s still got much to offer. As the premium catcher on the market, New York would have taken a big hit if they had lost him because in many ways he is irreplaceable. His experience behind the plate and in the clubhouse will be vital for the the Yankees’ young hurlers in 2008 and beyond. It’s a relatively large amount of money for a man of his age, but he’s worth it.

Pessimist’s argument: It’s the age old story: club stalwart has a great campaign in his walk-year, he asks for the earth and the team can’t say no. Four years for a thirty-six year old catcher? It’s going to end in tears. He’s not going to repeat his 2007 performance again and the impact a veteran catcher can have on young pitchers is grossly exaggerated.

Voice of Reason: Given his age and his fielding position, this is a great deal for Posada and it’s fair to say he has earned it. Ideally the Yankees wouldn’t have wanted to stretch to four years, but the Mets were prepared to do it by all accounts so they had little choice. Look at the other options out there. Who could the Yankees have signed to replace Posada? There’s a big drop-off to the likes of Barrett, Lo Duca or Torrealba on the free agent market and the Twins, Dodgers and Braves would rightly want Phil Hughes plus a couple of other quality parts for Mauer, Martin or McCann. Any way you look at it, the Yankees have made the right move. The one problem with this contract is that Posada’s performances could take a sudden nose dive, making him an expensive problem. For anyone else, that might make me more cautious. With the Yankees, that problem is minimized as they can afford to eat the contract.

Wider Impact Rating: 6. Most people thought Posada would stay with the Yankees, so this deal isn’t going to send shock waves throughout the Majors. Had the Mets been successful in tempting him to Queens, it would have been a different story. That’s where the real impact will be felt: the Mets picked up Johnny Estrada instead and there’s a big difference between the two. Posada’s value is so much higher than the other free agent catchers that it’s unlikely this will have an inflationary effect on their demands.

Cordero signs with Reds

Details: Francisco Cordero agrees a four year, $46 million contract with the Reds (with a $12m club option).

Optimist’s argument: The Reds have got to start their rebuilding somewhere and picking up the premium closer on the market (after Rivera) is as good a place as any. Not only will Cordero be a decent upgrade over last year’s closer David Weathers, but it means that Weathers can slide back one position to make for a strong set-up man/closer partnership. Taking him away from one of their NL Central rivals is the icing on the cake.

Pessimist’s argument: Ladies and gentleman, may I introduce you to this year’s Baltimore Orioles. It didn’t work out for the O’s in 2007 and the odds aren’t good for the Reds in 2008. A team this far from contention cannot afford to splurge $46 million on a guy who will pitch around seventy innings in a season. The best you can say is that if Cordero was looking for lucrative “saves” bonuses, the Reds will be saving a bit of money. They won’t be giving him as many opportunities as he enjoyed with the Brewers in 2007.

Voice of Reason: Sadly for Reds fans, the pessimist is correct in this case. Of course this deal improves their bullpen, but what about their hitting and their starting pitching? They are equalling deserving of attention, arguably more so. If you’re on the verge of being a genuine pennant winner, spending this sort of money on a closer just about makes sense. If it pushes you over the line and gets you to the post-season, it’s worth the investment. The NL Central is an open division, but this looks to be an expensive gamble because they still need a lot more than Cordero to bridge the gap. If the Reds do go out and add a couple of starters and a quality bat or two, maybe this opinion will be revised. At the moment, it doesn’t look too clever. And then there’s the Dusty factor: let’s hope he doesn’t pitch Cordero’s arm off.

Wider Impact Rating: 8. While I’m not convinced this has a significant impact on the NL Central race, it undoubtedly has an impact on the market for closers. The Yankees’ proposed deal with Rivera would top this in terms of annual salary, but Mo is a special case. There will be more than a few GMs cursing at the Reds right now: they’ve really hiked up the closer salary bar.

Hunter signs with the Angels

Details: Torii Hunter joins the Angels on a five-year deal, worth $90 million.

Optimist’s argument: They may have won the AL West at a canter in 2007, but that’s not good enough for the Angels. Five years from their first World Series victory, this is a clear sign that they intend to get back there. Having secured a top pitcher in Jon Garland via a trade, they now add one of the premium free agents on the market. Adding Hunter gives the Angels a formidable group of outfielders and DH options, arguably the most formidable in the Majors.

Pessimist’s argument: A sign of poor planning if ever I’ve seen one. Paying $50 million for five years of Gary Matthews Jnr was one of the many examples of the money-rich going mad last year. Some may say this makes up for the mistake, but maybe it compounds it. Hunter isn’t quite the player he was before his horrific ankle injury in 2005 and combined with his age, there’s a good chance that more injuries may come followed by a move to a corner outfield spot. If so, Hunter’s going to look very expensive in a couple of years time, while Matthews will still be around on his inflated salary as well.

Voice of reason: There’s no doubt that this deal improves the Angels. Maybe the outfield didn’t appear to be a particular priority for them, but sometimes the wisest policy is to get the best talent you can and then work from there. They can now use their surplus of outfielders to trade for other useful parts, dealing from a position of strength. Hunter is still a top player with his bat and in the field and he’s an exceptional character to have in the clubhouse. $18m a year looks a touch on the heavy side, but the Angels have the financial backing to take that on the chin.

Wider impact rating: 9. This deal sets the market for the other main free agent centre fielders (Rowand, Andruw Jones, Mike Cameron) for a start. Whether Hunter’s other pursuers, the White Sox, the Royals and the Rangers, will now show similar interest in those three remains to be seen. As for the Twins, by all accounts they were nowhere close to the Angels’ offer and their fans will be hoping that means they are saving their money to re-sign Johan Santana, but will be fearing this is the start of an exodus of their top-shelf talent. Finally, having already swung one trade for Jon Garland, the Angels now have a surplus of outfielders to deal from (with the caveat that one or two will also go into the DH mix). The Miguel Carbera rumours continue to circulate and if they can bag the third baseman, they will have a seriously intimidating batting lineup.

Babe: The Legend comes to Life by Robert W. Creamer

“Babe: The Legend Comes to Life” by Robert W. Creamer, (Fireside, 1992), 443 pages.

Even the most baseball-belittling Brit has heard of Babe Ruth. He is recognised the world over as one of the greatest and most important sportsmen in history. Robert W. Creamer’s biography of Ruth, originally published in 1974, is often held to be the book that such a legend deserves. Having finished reading “Babe: The Legend Comes to Life”, you are left in no doubt that both Ruth’s status as a sporting great and this book’s status as a great biography are fully deserved.

In his Author’s Note before the main text begins, Creamer makes a comment that initially catches the reader off-guard: “Some of the baseball detail may prove tedious to the casual reader, who is given permission to skip such passages. Baseball fans are expected to wade through the whole thing”. It serves as a useful reminder that Babe Ruth was more than just a great ballplayer. He was a cultural icon, somebody whose personality and fame stretched far beyond the normal baseball-loving masses.

But more on his wider impact in a moment; we are baseball fans here and, as promised, there is much for us to “wade through”. Short of giving an exact game-by-game account of every occasion that Ruth took the field, this is as detailed an account of his playing career as you could hope for. Ruth began his professional career with a brief period as a member of his home-town Baltimore Orioles (not yet a Major League team), then made his Major League debut with the Red Sox in 1915 before his infamous trade to the Yankees in December 1919.

Each season during his career is taken in turn, with memorable moments highlighted before Ruth’s and his team’s year is reviewed and put into context. As you move from one exciting season to the next, two things really stand out. Firstly, that prior to his slugging super-stardom, Ruth was a genuinely brilliant Major League pitcher. Secondly, that his legendary status was fully merited: season after season he put up staggering numbers.

The mark of a truly great sportsman is that they change the way their respective sport is played. The Babe certainly did that. We take home run hitting for granted today, yet before Ruth the long ball was treated with relative ambivalence. The fact that other players have now surpassed Ruth’s home run feats does not diminish them. They are still extremely impressive compared to today’s players, and unbelievably so compared to his contemporaries. Ruth’s total of 54 homers in 1920, for example, was four more than any other American League team managed to hit combined that season (the Yankees hit 115 in total).

And it wasn’t just the number that Ruth hit which captured the imagination, it was their often majestic length (generally described as “Ruthian” home runs) and his violent all-or-nothing swing that really set him apart. “I hit big or I miss big. I like to live as big as I can” is an oft-repeated quote from the Babe and it sums him up perfectly.

The fact that Ruth liked to live “big” added another dimension to his legend. He commanded extravagant salaries, infamously earning more than the President in 1931, and was not shy in spending his money, dishing out ridiculously large tips to those who crossed his path. His huge appetite for food was only surpassed by his appetite for women, which was not the least bit quelled by his two marriages.

This introduces the less-savoury side to his character, the side of endless cheating on his wives and suspensions and fines for indiscretions on and off the field. Ruth was no angel, but perhaps that was no surprise when considering his journey from a restrictive orphanage, where he lived from the age of eight until he signed with Orioles when he was twenty, to fame and fortune at a level unheard of at the time. Creamer notes that despite his faults, few people who knew the Babe failed to smile at the mention of his name when asked to share their memories of him. He was a man with a presence, someone who could immediately light up a room when he walked in, and someone who was easy to forgive.

Ruth’s life has provoked a raft of myths and oversimplified, extreme caricatures of the man himself. This biography is a very deliberate attempt to counteract them. There is very little personal opinion or commentary from Creamer. He doesn’t go overboard in his praise of Ruth’s achievements, he simply recounts the details and lets them speak for themselves. He doesn’t engage in salacious gossip and neither condemns nor condones Ruth’s behaviour. He passes on the facts as he sees them following his rigorous research and leaves any judgements to the reader.

As a result, this book contains one minor omission. Aside from some brief comments in the opening chapter, there is no attempt to place Ruth, either as a ballplayer or as an American cultural icon, into some sort of historical context. Perhaps this would have required the type of subjective personal analysis that Creamer was seemingly trying to avoid (and the book was written in 1974 of course), but it would have brought this still great biography to a slightly more satisfying conclusion.

As it is, we briefly learn of Ruth’s frustrated attempts to become a Major League manager, followed by his deteriorating health and then his death from cancer. With no warning, the book ends abruptly there. This does have the dramatic effect of reinforcing the sadness of his death, but that seems misplaced precisely because the memory of Ruth lives on to this day. A short chapter explaining how and why this is the case would have wrapped this book up perfectly.

But it’s a minor criticism. This is a great biography about the greatest player the game has ever seen. No baseball fan should be without a copy.

Have you read “Babe: The Legend Comes to Life”? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section below. Can you recommend any other similar books? If so, let us know.

BaseballGB book reviews

One of the great joys of baseball, particularly for British fans keen to learn as much as possible about it, is that the sport has been the inspiration for countless wonderful books. The quality of writing about baseball probably surpasses that of any other sport and the only problem is knowing where on earth to start!

One of the reasons why I moved to this domain back in April was that I wanted BaseballGB to be more than just a blog. I wanted to create a few “resource” features that were not dependent on current affairs and could be built up over time to form a substantial reference section. Book reviews were one of the first things to come to mind.

My plan is to read (well, in several cases re-read) and review a book every week over the off-season, which would take me to about twenty reviews by the time the 2008 season begins. Although I haven’t published any yet, I am on schedule, with four books already switched from the “to read” pile to the “read” pile. I plan to publish the first review, a look at Robert Creamer’s seminal biography of Babe Ruth, on Wednesday and for no particular reason I think I’m going to stick to Wednesday being “book review” day. Hopefully everything will go to plan and twenty reviews will be published by April next year (maybe more? we’ll see) and from that point onwards I will aim to add more reviews on a regular basis. If I read a baseball book, and it’s rare that I don’t have one on the go, I’ll write a review and publish it here.

Of course, book reviews are no exact science. They will represent my personal opinion and your own reviews of these books (plus recommendations of similar titles that other readers and I might enjoy) are more than welcome. By April 2009 (which seems a long way away right now) I aim to have published over fifty substantial book reviews which, along with your comments, should be a useful resource for newcomers to the sport as well as established fans who would like a bit of guidance on what to read next.

It’s difficult to overstate just how much great baseball writing is out there for us to enjoy and the list of must-reads seems to get bigger every year with hordes of new candidates being published. Best get on with reading then!

Joe Kennedy 1979-2007

Shocking news to wake up to this morning.

Joe Kennedy passed away yesterday at the age of twenty-eight, leaving behind a young family. It’s hard not to think back five years to the sad passing of Darryl Kile, another Major League pitcher who died suddenly with no warning. In Kile’s case, the death was related to a heart condition and it is believed that this may have been the cause of Kennedy’s death, although this is still to be confirmed. Very sad news.

Lowell back in Boston

Details: Mike Lowell agrees to stay with the Red Sox, signing a 3 year, $37.5m deal.

Optimist’s argument: Why break up a winning combination? Lowell played a major part in the Red Sox winning the World Series in 2007, as the MVP award shows. The Red Sox nation wanted him to stay and the player made it clear that his heart was in Boston. Factor in his overall contribution in 2007, including career highs in batting average and RBIs as well as other categories, and they would have been mad to let him go.

Pessimist’s argument: 2007 was a great year for Lowell, but when a player has his best season of his career at thirty-three years old, you’re a fool if you think he’s going to keep that level of performance up. Think back only two years ago and this guy was basically a throw-in to the Beckett deal following a dreadful 2005 campaign. If he returns to anywhere close to that .236/.298/.360, then his $12.5m a year salary isn’t going to look quite the bargain that some people are claiming it is. Oh, and don’t forget that one of the other career highs he set in 2007 was for errors. Lowell timed his career year perfectly for himself, but the only way is down and he could plummet quickly.

Voice of reason: Have to side with the optimist here. Lowell isn’t going to repeat his 2007 season, but his 2005 disaster was similarly out of line with his career levels. His career average is .280/.344/.468 with 23 homers, which is very close to his 2006 season and that’s about what you should expect from him (accompanied by some solid and occasionally spectacular defence at third base). What really makes this a good deal for Boston is that they were able to limit it to three years, despite apparent interest from other teams who were prepared to stretch to a fourth year. Four years would be a big commitment for a thirty-three year old and by holding firm on their three-year offer, the Red Sox have reduced the risk of him becoming a financial burden if he doesn’t age gracefully. Mike Lowell has clearly conceded a bit of ground to make this happen, but that’s his prerogative and it makes a welcome change from the many other examples when a player chases the top dollar and then finds that money isn’t everything, particularly when you’re going to earn a healthy sum in any case. It looks like a great deal for both sides.

Wider impact rating: 7. Taking A-Rod out of the equation, there’s really not a lot else out there on the third base free agent market. The Dodgers were very interested in signing Lowell, so they may have to turn their attentions to putting together a package of their top prospects for his former Florida team mate Miguel Cabrera. As for the Red Sox, they may have had to consider switching Youkillis to third and shopping for a first base man if Lowell had walked away. This makes their off-season a little less complicated.

Glavine rejoins the Braves

(Note – this is the first of a new format where I will be rating the most interesting free agent deals that are agreed over the off-season as they are confirmed. The talent pool might not be the most impressive of recent years, but there’s still going to be plenty to discuss – not least when someone decides to pay Kyle Lohse as if he’s the second-coming of Sandy Koufax)

Details: Tom Glavine agreed a one-year deal with the Braves, worth $8m.

Optimist’s argument: How can it go wrong? Glavine returns to Atlanta for one last season, with a fairytale ending in his sights. The Braves get a solid innings-eater to plug into their rotation at a decent price, relative to the market. With Mike Hampton being somewhat of a wildcard heading into 2008 after missing the last two seasons through injury, Glavine’s steady presence is exactly what they need.

Pessimist’s argument: Sometimes sentimentalism can cloud good judgement. Glavine’s 2007 performance might not have been terrible, but that 4.45 ERA and just 89 strikeouts show that this is a great pitcher on his way out. A bad start to 2008 and the Braves may have to do the unthinkable to their former hero and put him out to pasture.

Voice of Reason: Put into context, it’s a decent deal for both sides. Glavine isn’t going to be an impact pitcher at this stage in his career, but the Braves aren’t expecting him to win a Cy Young award in 2008. Over the last thirteen seasons, the least amount of innings he’s pitched in a single year is 183 in 2003. So the odds are good that they will get 190+ innings from him at slightly better than league-average performance. As your ace, that’s not much to shout about, but with Smoltz and Hudson leading from the front, Glavine can play an effective role in what looks to be a very solid rotation. If anything, $8 million is a touch below what you would expect to pay (the Mets had a $13m option for example, which Glavine turned down – although he did get $3m as a result to make up some of the short fall). So even disregarding the heart-warming story of seeing Glavine back in a Braves uniform, the optimist’s argument still looks the more realistic bet.

Wider impact rating: 7. Probably doesn’t have much of an impact on the rest of the free agent pitching class, but adding Glavine to their rotation improves the Braves and hurts the Mets, which could prove decisive in the NL East battle. Pedro Martinez could fill that void of course (and then some), yet his five-game cameo at the end of last season doesn’t give us a great deal to go on for predicting what his 2008 may bring. Certainly there are a lot of question marks against the Mets’ rotation right now and GM Omar Minaya may have to overpay on the free agent market to shore it up.

Bonds indicted

The Barry Bonds saga hit a new low this week with the announcement that he has been indicted by a federal grand jury on four counts of perjury and one count of obstructing the course of justice.

While the official confirmation did seem to cause some shock, this has been in the offing for well over a year. The insinuation has been that the grand jury were convinced of their case, but that it has taken a while to put together enough evidence to make them confident of gaining a successful conviction. The Bonds’ camp have used this delay as evidence of a campaign to ‘get’ Barry, firmly trying to place him in the role of the victim. That point of view may find a hint of sympathy for some in relation to the way Bonds has been vilified by accusations of drug use at a level well above every other ballplayer. However, the charges in question move well beyond allegations of drug use alone.

The legal side will run its own course and it’s probably unwise to speculate too much on how it will turn out. We can consider the impact on his future Major League career though. I’ve yet to see a comprehensive timetable for the upcoming process, aside from Bonds having to appear in court on 7 December, but it’s safe to say that this will be a drawn-out affair.

Had Bonds been contracted to an organization (e.g. signing an extension with the Giants), then the immediate situation would have been more complicated for MLB. As the governing body of every major sport has to when confronted with this type of situation, Bud Selig trotted out the “everyone’s innocent until proven guilty” line in response to the announcement. Whether a league can suspend a player while court proceedings are taking place is often a legal minefield.

As it is, the potential embarrassment of seeing Bonds performing (and increasing his career home run record total) while this legal action is ongoing will be avoided. Bonds’s free agent status has put paid to that. No team will sign him with this hanging over his head. All of the negative publicity and problems it would cause will simply not be worth it. Anyone running a book on which team Bonds was likely to join during the off-season may have to wrap it up, unless they had included a prison team as a joke.

Regardless of the outcome, when you consider his age and the fact that Bonds was looking to play for one more season, the indictment has almost certainly brought an end to his career. That won’t be the end of the story for MLB though. Far from it. Bonds might not be coming back, but his presence is not going away. While seeing Bonds in a Major League uniform would be a massive story next April, not seeing him in one is going to be an all-consuming news event just the same.

Then we’ll have the Hall of Fame debate in five years’ time.

Fairly or not, baseball’s name will be dragged through the mud as a result of the indictment as well. The coverage of the story in British newspapers today is testament to that. Add in the impending Mitchell report and the public image of the sport, as projected by the media, could well be at odds with the evidence Selig put forward this week about baseball being more popular than ever before.

Selig was correct in drawing attention to the booming state of the game. Let’s hope one man’s plight doesn’t overshadow this fact, whatever the outcome of the proceedings.

Peavy’s award confirmed

To no great surprise, Jake Peavy has just been confirmed as the NL Cy Young award winner.  It was a unanimous decision, with all thirty-two voters placing the Padres’ ace in first position.   Brandon Webb was second on thirty-one of the ballots, with the Reds’ Aaron Harang getting one second-place vote (probably from one of the two voters from Cincinnati – not that this would just be a case of favouring the home player: Harang’s season was easy to overlook considering he was playing on such a poor team).

That leaves two main awards still to be decided.  The AL MVP award winner will be announced on Monday, although I think we can all pencil A. Rodriguez in for that one.  The NL MVP will be announced the following day and that promises to be a more interesting decision.  Despite helping his team to the World Series, I have a feeling that Holliday will miss out.  Prince Fielder has put forward a strong case, but my guess is that Jimmy Rollins will just get the nod.  As with any such award, one thing can be guaranteed: fans of the contenders who don’t win will not be shy in voicing their displeasure!