Texas 2024 local ballot measures
| Texas Local Ballot Measures | |
|---|---|
2025 »
« 2023
| |
 | |
| Texas ballot measures | |
| State measures | |
| Local measures | |
| 2024 ballot measures | |
| State measures | |
| Local measures | |
Ballotpedia covered local ballot measures in Texas on May 4, 2024.
In 2024, Ballotpedia covered local ballot measures that appeared on the ballot for voters within the 100 largest cities in the U.S., within state capitals, and throughout California. You can review the coverage scope of the local ballot measures project here.
Ballotpedia covered electoral system-related ballot measures, like ranked-choice voting, and policing-related ballot measures outside of the largest cities.
- See also: Local ballot measure elections in 2024
Election dates
November 5
Bexar County
- See also: Bexar County, Texas ballot measures
• East Central Independent School District, Texas, Proposition A, School Tax Measure (November 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $932 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "no" vote opposed ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $932 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $331 million in bonds, with revenue going to fund school facilities, and levying taxes to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $331 million in bonds, with revenue going to fund school facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $10 million in bonds, with revenue going to fund school stadium facilities, and levying taxes to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $10 million in bonds, with revenue going to fund school stadium facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $18.8 million in bonds, with revenue going to fund outdoor recreational facilities, and levying taxes to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $18.8 million in bonds, with revenue going to fund outdoor recreational facilities. |
• San Antonio, Texas, Proposition A, Ethics Review Board Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add a definition of "conflicts of interest" to Article XIII, require sufficient funding to the Ethics Review Board, and authorize the Board to accept or decline complaints that have been resolved by another entity. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add a definition of "conflicts of interest" to Article XIII, require sufficient funding to the Ethics Review Board, and authorize the Board to accept or decline complaints that have been resolved by another entity. |
• San Antonio, Texas, Proposition B, Language Modernization Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported revising or eliminating provisions of the city charter which have been superseded by state law. |
A "no" vote opposed revising or eliminating provisions of the city charter which have been superseded by state law. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to grant the city council the authority to set full terms of the city manager's employment, including tenure and compensation. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to grant the city council the authority to set full terms of the city manager's employment, including tenure and compensation. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to allow city employees to participate in local political activity consistent with state and federal law while protecting employees against political retribution, and maintaining a general prohibition on participation in politics for the city leadership team. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow city employees to participate in local political activity consistent with state and federal law while protecting employees against political retribution, and maintaining a general prohibition on participation in politics for the city leadership team. |
• San Antonio, Texas, Proposition E, City Council Compensation Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to set and limit the compensation for city council members and the mayor at $70,200 and $87,800 annually. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to set and limit the compensation for city council members and the mayor at $70,200 and $87,800 annually. |
• San Antonio, Texas, Proposition F, City Council Terms Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to extend the terms of all elected members of the city council, including the mayor, from two years to four years, and changing the term limits from four full terms to two full terms. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to extend the terms of all elected members of the city council, including the mayor, from two years to four years, and changing the term limits from four full terms to two full terms. |
Dallas County
- See also: Dallas County, Texas ballot measures
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition A, Changes to City Employee Retirement Fund Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending city code to make changes to the city employees' retirement fund's governing board, contribution amounts, and the process to amend this chapter of city code. |
A "no" vote opposed amending city code to make changes to the city employees' retirement fund's governing board, contribution amounts, and the process to amend this chapter of city code. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition B, Add Preamble to City Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add a preamble that reads: "We, the people of the City of Dallas, under the constitution and laws of the state of Texas, establish this preamble in order to secure the benefits of local self-government and set forth the guiding principles for our city. We affirm the values of our city as an equitable democracy, comprised of representatives that act to make our city fair, equitable, just, and safe for all those who reside within it." |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add a preamble. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to increase the mayor's salary to $110,000 and city council members' salaries to $90,000 adjusted for inflation beginning on January 1, 2025. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to increase the mayor's salary to $110,000 and city council members' salaries to $90,000 adjusted for inflation beginning on January 1, 2025. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition D, Change to City Council Elections Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the requirement that city council elections be held in May and instead be held according to state law and as designated by city resolution. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to remove the requirement that city council elections be held in May and instead be held according to state law and as designated by city resolution. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the ability for the mayor or city council members to run again after allowing a term to pass after serving the maximum two four-year terms or four two-year terms, respectively. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter, thereby allowing the mayor or city council members to run again after allowing a term to pass after serving the maximum two four-year terms or four two-year terms, respectively. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require the city council to provide employees to the city secretary and auditor in addition to assistants. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require the city council to provide employees to the city secretary and auditor in addition to assistants. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add eligibility criteria for members serving on the redistricting commission. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add eligibility criteria for members serving on the redistricting commission. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the requirements that members of city boards and commissions be registered voters, qualified voters, or qualified taxpaying citizens. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to remove the requirements that members of city boards and commissions be registered voters, qualified voters, or qualified taxpaying citizens. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to increase the number of days initiative petitioners have to collect signatures from 60 to 120 days and reduces the number of required signatures from 10% of qualified voters to 5%. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to increase the number of days initiative petitioners have to collect signatures from 60 to 120 days and reduces the number of required signatures from 10% of qualified voters to 5%. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to authorize the city council to replace appointments to city boards and commissions before two-year term completion. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize the city council to replace appointments to city boards and commissions before two-year term completion. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to establish the office of the inspector general, which would be appointed by the city council. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to establish the office of the inspector general, which would be appointed by the city council. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require the terms of associate municipal judges, authorize administrative judge to designate assignments, and require judges to be residents of Dallas within four months of appointment. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require the terms of associate municipal judges, authorize administrative judge to designate assignments, and require judges to be residents of Dallas within four months of appointment. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove the requirement that a city employee must pay half of the cost of an appeal hearing when appealing their discharge or reduction in grade. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to remove the requirement that a city employee must pay half of the cost of an appeal hearing when appealing their discharge or reduction in grade. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition Q, Technical Corrections to Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to make technical corrections and clarifying changes to conform with state law. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to make technical corrections and clarifying changes to conform with state law. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition R, Marijuana Decriminalization Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to decriminalize marijuana, making it the lowest enforcement priority for the Dallas Police Department. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to decriminalize marijuana. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to grant citizens standing to bring a lawsuit against the city, entitles them to seek declaratory and injunctive relief, and waives the city's governmental immunity from suit and liability claims. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to grant citizens standing to bring a lawsuit against the city, entitles them to seek declaratory and injunctive relief, and waives the city's governmental immunity from suit and liability claims. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition T, Require Annual Community Survey Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require the city to conduct an annual community survey annually with at least 1,400 Dallas residents. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require the city to conduct an annual community survey annually with at least 1,400 Dallas residents. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require the city to spend no less than 50% of the annual revenue that exceeds the previous year's annual revenue to fund the Dallas Police and Fire Pension and increasing starting salaries for Dallas police officers and require the city to have at least 4,000 officers. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require the city to spend no less than 50% of the annual revenue that exceeds the previous year's annual revenue to fund the Dallas Police and Fire Pension and increasing starting salaries for Dallas police officers and require the city to have at least 4,000 officers. |
• Irving, Texas, Proposition A, Allow Collective Bargaining for Fire Fighters Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported allowing fire fighters to collectively bargain upon a majority vote of the affected employees and maintaining prohibition and penalties for strikes and lockouts. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing fire fighters to collectively bargain upon a majority vote of the affected employees and maintaining prohibition and penalties for strikes and lockouts. |
El Paso County
- See also: El Paso County, Texas ballot measures
A "yes" vote supported canceling the city's authority to issue the remaining $128.46 million in general obligation bonds for the Multipurpose Performing Arts and Entertainment Facility in Downtown El Paso, which voters approved in 2012. |
A "no" vote opposed canceling the city's authority to issue the remaining $128.46 million in general obligation bonds for the Multipurpose Performing Arts and Entertainment Facility in Downtown El Paso. |
• El Paso County, Texas, Proposition A, Parks and Recreation Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the county to issue up to $95.6 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to fund parks and recreational spaces, and levying taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the county to issue up to $95.6 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to fund parks and recreational spaces. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the county to issue up to $26.7 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's Office of the Medical Examiner, and levying taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the county to issue up to $26.7 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's Office of the Medical Examiner. |
• El Paso County, Texas, Proposition C, Courthouse Bond Measure (November 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the county to issue up to $63.2 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's courthouse, sub courthouses, and related annexes, and levying taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the county to issue up to $63.2 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's courthouse, sub courthouses, and related annexes. |
• El Paso County, Texas, Proposition D, Coliseum Bond Measure (November 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the county to issue up to $105 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's Coliseum and adjacent facilities, and levying taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the county to issue up to $105 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's Coliseum and adjacent facilities. |
• El Paso County, Texas, Proposition E, Animal Shelter Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the county to issue up to $32.7 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's animal shelter, and levying taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the county to issue up to $32.7 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the county's animal shelter. |
• El Paso County Hospital District, Texas, Proposition A, Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $396 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the district's hospital system, and levying taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $396 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to the district's hospital system. |
Harris County
- See also: Harris County, Texas ballot measures
• Addicks Utility District, Texas, Proposition A, Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $57 million in bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $57 million in bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
• Addicks Utility District, Texas, Proposition B, Refunding Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $10 million in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $10 million in refunding bonds to refund bonds issued for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “yes” vote supported an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $500 per $100,000 valuation. |
A “no” vote opposed an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $500 per $100,000 valuation. |
• Alief Independent School District, Texas, Proposition A, Tax Rate Measure (November 2024): ✔
A “yes” vote supported ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1,047.60 per $100,000, resulting in an increase of 9.43% in revenue compared to the previous year. |
A “no” vote opposed ratifying the ad valorem tax rate of $1,047.60 per $100,000, resulting in an increase of 9.43% in revenue compared to the previous year. |
A “yes” vote supported an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $500 per $100,000 valuation for taxable property. |
A “no” vote opposed an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $500 per $100,000 valuation for taxable property. |
A “yes” vote supported approving the ad valorem tax rate of $100 per $100,000 valuation for maintaining fire protection and rescue services. |
A “no” vote opposed approving the ad valorem tax rate of $100 per $100,000 valuation for maintaining fire protection and rescue services. |
• Harris County Flood Control District, Texas, Proposition A, Tax Rate Measure (November 2024): ✔
A “yes” vote supported approving the ad valorem tax rate of $48.97 per $100,000 valuation for operating and maintaining flood risk reduction infrastructure. |
A “no” vote opposed approving the ad valorem tax rate of $48.97 per $100,000 valuation for operating and maintaining flood risk reduction infrastructure. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $54.7 million in bonds for waterworks, sanitary sewer, storm water sewer, and solid waste disposal systems. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $54.7 million in bonds for waterworks, sanitary sewer, storm water sewer, and solid waste disposal systems. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $54.7 million in refunding bonds for waterworks, sanitary sewer, storm water sewer, and solid waste disposal systems. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $54.7 million in refunding bonds for waterworks, sanitary sewer, storm water sewer, and solid waste disposal systems. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of $11 million in bonds for water, sewer, and drainage system improvements. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $11 million in bonds for water, sewer, and drainage system improvements. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of $11 million in refunding bonds for refunding any bonds issued for water, sewer, and drainage systems. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $11 million in refunding bonds for refunding any bonds issued for water, sewer, and drainage systems. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of $450.75 million in bonds for water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and storm sewer systems, and refunding bonds. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $450.75 million in bonds for water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and storm sewer systems, and refunding bonds. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of $85.05 million in bonds for recreational facilities and refunding bonds. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $85.05 million in bonds for recreational facilities and refunding bonds. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of $191.55 million in bonds for roads and refunding road bonds. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $191.55 million in bonds for roads and refunding road bonds. |
A “yes” vote supported an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $1,500.00 per $100,000 valuation for facilities in the defined area. |
A “no” vote opposed an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $1,500.00 per $100,000 valuation for facilities in the defined area. |
A “yes” vote supported an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $250 per $100,000 valuation for road facilities in the defined area. |
A “no” vote opposed an operation and maintenance tax not to exceed $250 per $100,000 valuation for road facilities in the defined area. |
A “yes” vote supported creating Municipal Utility District (MUD) No. 516 and provide for the election of directors. |
A “no” vote opposed creating Municipal Utility District (MUD) No. 516 and provide for the election of directors. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $282.95 million in bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $282.95 million in bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $41.2 million in refunding bonds for recreational facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $41.2 million in refunding bonds for recreational facilities. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $114.39 million in bonds for road facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $114.39 million in bonds for road facilities. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $282.95 million in refunding bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $282.95 million in refunding bonds for water, sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of up to $41.2 million in refunding bonds for recreational facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of up to $41.2 million in refunding bonds for recreational facilities. |
A “yes” vote supported the issuance of $114.39 million in refunding bonds for road facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $114.39 million in refunding bonds for road facilities. |
A “yes” vote supports authorizing an operation and maintenance tax of up to $1,500 per $100,000 of taxable property value. |
A “no” vote opposes authorizing an operation and maintenance tax of up to $1,500 per $100,000 of taxable property value. |
A “yes” vote supports the issuance of $5.71 million in refunding bonds for refunding bonds issued for recreational facilities. |
A “no” vote opposes the issuance of $5.71 million in refunding bonds for refunding bonds issued for recreational facilities. |
A “yes” vote supports the issuance of $5.71 million in bonds for recreational facilities. |
A “no” vote opposed the issuance of $5.71 million in bonds for recreational facilities. |
• Houston Independent School District, Texas, Proposition A, Schoolhouse Bond Measure (November 2024): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the issuance of $3.96 billion in schoolhouse bonds for new and renovated school buildings, including safety infrastructure. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the issuance of $3.96 billion in schoolhouse bonds for new and renovated school buildings, including safety infrastructure. |
• Houston Independent School District, Texas, Proposition B, Schoolhouse Bond Measure (November 2024): ✖
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the issuance of $440 million in bonds for technology equipment, infrastructure, and instruction technology. |
A “no” vote opposed authorizing the issuance of $440 million in bonds for technology equipment, infrastructure, and instruction technology. |
• Newport Municipal Utility District, Texas, Proposition A, Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A “yes” vote supports the issuance of $110 million in refunding bonds for refunding bonds issued for sewer and drainage systems. |
A “no” vote opposes the issuance of $110 million in refunding bonds for refunding bonds issued for sewer and drainage systems. |
Lubbock County
- See also: Lubbock County, Texas ballot measures
• Frenship ISD, Texas, Proposition A, Tax Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported ratifying the Frenship ISD ad valorem tax rate of $756.70 per $100,000 valuation, which will increase maintenance and operations revenue by 18.59%. |
A "no" vote opposed ratifying the Frenship ISD ad valorem tax rate of $756.70 per $100,000 valuation. |
• Frenship ISD, Texas, Proposition B, Safety and Infrastructure Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Frenship ISD to issue $189,500,000 in bonds for safety and infrastructure upgrades, school buses, and new elementary schools, with a tax levy for payment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Frenship ISD to issue $189,500,000 in bonds for safety and infrastructure upgrades, school buses, and new elementary schools, with a tax levy for payment. |
• Frenship ISD, Texas, Proposition C, Instructional Technology Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the Frenship ISD to issue $10,000,000 in bonds for instructional technology, with a tax levy for payment. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the Frenship ISD to issue $10,000,000 in bonds for instructional technology, with a tax levy for payment. |
• Lubbock, Texas, Proposition A, Annexation Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the City of Lubbock to annex 374.74 acres including the Highland Oaks subdivision and impose a property tax at the same rate as other areas in the city. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the City of Lubbock to annex 374.74 acres including the Highland Oaks subdivision and impose a property tax at the same rate as other areas in the city. |
• Lubbock, Texas, Proposition A, Street Improvements Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the City of Lubbock to issue $103.4 million in bonds for street improvements and impose a tax to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the City of Lubbock to issue $103.4 million in bonds for street improvements and impose a tax to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
• Roosevelt ISD, Texas, Proposition A, School Facilities Bond Measure (November 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing Roosevelt ISD to issue $58,500,000 in bonds for school facilities and levy taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing Roosevelt ISD to issue $58,500,000 in bonds for school facilities and levy taxes to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. |
Nueces County
- See also: Nueces County, Texas ballot measures
• Corpus Christi, Texas, Proposition A, Streets Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue up to $89.5 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to street, sidewalk, drainage and related improvements. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue up to $89.5 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to street, sidewalk, drainage and related improvements. |
• Corpus Christi, Texas, Proposition B, Parks and Recreation Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue up to $37.6 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to park and recreational facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue up to $37.6 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to park and recreational facilities. |
• Corpus Christi, Texas, Proposition C, Public Safety Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue up to $45 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to public safety facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue up to $45 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to public safety facilities. |
• Corpus Christi, Texas, Proposition D, Cultural Facilities Bond Measure (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue up to $2.85 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to city cultural facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue up to $2.85 million in bonds, with bond revenue going to city cultural facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported repurposing the 0.125% per $1 sales tax, which was originally used for arena improvements, to be used for infrastructure improvement projects pertaining to city-wide arterial and collector streets and city-owned recreational and community facilities. |
A "no" vote opposed repurposing the 0.125% per $1 sales tax, which was originally used for arena improvements, to be used for infrastructure improvement projects pertaining to city-wide arterial and collector streets and city-owned recreational and community facilities. |
A "yes" vote supported repurposing the 0.125% per $1 sales tax, which was originally used for seawall improvements, to be used for infrastructure improvement projects pertaining to downtown seawall flood control structures and other city-wide flood control, drainage, stormwater, and coastal resiliency projects. |
A "no" vote opposed repurposing the 0.125% per $1 sales tax, which was originally used for seawall improvements, to be used for infrastructure improvement projects pertaining to downtown seawall flood control structures and other city-wide flood control, drainage, stormwater, and coastal resiliency projects. |
Potter County
- See also: Potter County, Texas ballot measures
• Amarillo, Texas, Proposition A, Local Abortion Policies Initiative (November 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to designate Amarillo as a Sanctuary City for the Unborn and enact specific city regulations and restrictions on abortion. |
Travis County
- See also: Travis County, Texas ballot measures
• Austin, Texas, Proposition P, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Measure (November 2024): ✔
| A "yes" vote supported releasing 96.9 acres of land (containing 35 lots on approximately 96.9 acres of land on Menchaca Road south of Slaughter Lane) from Austin's extraterritorial jurisdiction into unincorporated Travis County, removing it from the city's environmental and development regulations. |
| A "no" vote opposed releasing 96.9 acres of land from the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction, which would keep the land under the city's environmental and development regulations. |
| A "yes" vote supported increasing the district's ad valorem tax rate to $950.50 per $100,000 valuation, increasing maintenance and operations tax revenue by $184,628,049 over the previous year. |
| A "no" vote opposed increasing the ad valorem tax rate, thereby maintaining the current tax rate without an increase in the district's operating revenue. |
| A "yes" vote supported increasing the district's ad valorem tax rate to $1.0814, resulting in an additional $6,318,206 in tax revenue compared to the previous year, to fund maintenance and operations. |
| A "no" vote opposed increasing the district ad valorem tax rate to $1.0814, thereby maintaining the current tax rate without an increase in school district revenue for district maintenance and operations. |
| A "yes" vote supported authorizing the issuance of $798.305 million in bonds to fund the construction, renovation, and acquisition of school facilities in Round Rock Independent School District. |
| A "no" vote opposed authorizing the issuance of $798.305 million in bonds for school facilities. |
| A "yes" vote supported authorizing $125.3 million in bonds for technology system upgrades and related infrastructure in Round Rock Independent School District. |
| A "no" vote opposed authorizing $125.3 million in bonds for technology system upgrades in Round Rock Independent School District. |
| A "yes" vote supported authorizing $8.62 million in bonds for the construction and acquisition of performing arts facilities in Round Rock Independent School District. |
| A "no" vote opposed authorizing $8.62 million in bonds for performing arts facilities in Round Rock Independent School District. |
| A "yes" vote supported authorizing $65.91 million in bonds for the construction and renovation of athletic stadium facilities in Round Rock Independent School District. |
| A "no" vote opposed authorizing $65.91 million in bonds for athletic stadium facilities in Round Rock Independent School District. |
• Travis County, Texas, Proposition A, Property Tax Rate Increase Measure (November 2024): ✔
| A "yes" vote supported incrasing county the ad valorem tax rate of $34.45 per $100,000 valuation in Travis County to fund childcare, afterschool programs, and workforce development for low-income families. |
| A "no" vote opposed increasing the district ad valorem tax rate. |
Webb County
- See also: Webb County, Texas ballot measures
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require city council members to live and be registered to vote in the district for which they file for candidacy for 180 days rather than 90 days prime to filing for candidacy, and requiring the mayor and councilmembers to reside in the city and their respective districts throughout their term of office. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require city council members to live and be registered to vote in the district for which they file for candidacy for 180 days rather than 90 days prime to filing for candidacy, and requiring the mayor and councilmembers to reside in the city and their respective districts throughout their term of office. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 2, Oath of Office Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to state that a person delaying taking the oath of office for longer than 12 months due to an election contest is not deemed to have served a full term. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to state that a person delaying taking the oath of office for longer than 12 months due to an election contest is not deemed to have served a full term. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 3, Mayor and City Council Employment Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to provide that if a mayor or councilmember is employed by the city or held city office immediately before their election, then he or she may apply to return to their prior city office or city employment after the expiration of their term. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to provide that if a mayor or councilmember is employed by the city or held city office immediately before their election, then he or she may apply to return to their prior city office or city employment after the expiration of their term. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to provide that a mayor or councilmember who is removed from office due to recall, conviction of a felony, or court order will be ineligible to hold elected office within the city. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to provide that a mayor or councilmember who is removed from office due to recall, conviction of a felony, or court order will be ineligible to hold elected office within the city. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 5, Mayoral Vote and Corrections Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to allow the mayor to vote in all cases. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow the mayor to vote in all cases. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 6, Mayoral Veto Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to allow the mayor to veto a vote at the same meeting or next meeting, rather than the next two meetings. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to allow the mayor to veto a vote at the same meeting or next meeting, rather than the next two meetings. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require the recommendation of the city manager and at least five votes of the city council to appoint, and at least six votes of the city council to remove, the city secretary, internal auditor, city attorney, clerk of the municipal court, and planning and zoning director. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require the recommendation of the city manager and at least five votes of the city council to appoint, and at least six votes of the city council to remove, the city secretary, internal auditor, city attorney, clerk of the municipal court, and planning and zoning director. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require six votes to remove the city manager rather than five votes, with no ability to veto by the mayor. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require six votes to remove the city manager rather than five votes, with no ability to veto by the mayor. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 9, Municipal Court Judges Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to increase the number of municipal court judges from one to two, require three years of experience in the practice of law, and provide for qualifications, appointments, confirmation, and removal of associate municipal court judges. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to increase the number of municipal court judges from one to two, require three years of experience in the practice of law, and provide for qualifications, appointments, confirmation, and removal of associate municipal court judges. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 10, Proposed Ordinance Elections Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to grant the city council the authority to submit binding and nonbinding elections for proposed ordinances. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to grant the city council the authority to submit binding and nonbinding elections for proposed ordinances. |
• Laredo, Texas, Proposition 11, Nepotism Article Charter Amendment (November 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to amend the nepotism article to also prohibit persons related within the second degree by affinity, or within the third degree of members of decision making boards and commissions, to be appointed to any office, clerkship, or other position in the city, but reduce the amount of time continuously employed by the City from two years to six months for existing employees to be exempt from the nepotism prohibition except for relations with members of the Ethics Commission and the Civil Service Commission. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to amend the nepotism article to also prohibit persons related within the second degree by affinity, or within the third degree of members of decision making boards and commissions, to be appointed to any office, clerkship, or other position in the city, but reduce the amount of time continuously employed by the City from two years to six months for existing employees to be exempt from the nepotism prohibition except for relations with members of the Ethics Commission and the Civil Service Commission. |
May 4
Dallas County
- See also: Dallas County, Texas ballot measures
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition A, Infrastructure Improvements Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $521,200,000 in bonds to fund public infrastructure improvements and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $521,200,000 in bonds to fund public infrastructure improvements and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition B, Parks and Recreation Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $345,270,000 in bonds to fund parks and recreation facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $345,270,000 in bonds to fund parks and recreation facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition C, Flood and Storm Drainage Facilities Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $52,100,000 in bonds to fund flood and storm drainage facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $52,100,000 in bonds to fund flood and storm drainage facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition D, Library Facilities Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $43,530,000 in bonds to fund library facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $43,530,000 in bonds to fund library facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition E, Cultural and Performing Arts Facilities Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $75,200,000 in bonds to fund cultural and performing arts facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $75,200,000 in bonds to fund cultural and performing arts facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition F, Public Safety Facilities Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $90,000,000 in bonds to fund public safety facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $90,000,000 in bonds to fund public safety facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition G, Economic Development Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $72,300,000 in bonds to fund economic development initiatives and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $72,300,000 in bonds to fund economic development initiatives and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition H, Housing Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $26,400,000 in bonds to fund housing for low-income households and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $26,400,000 in bonds to fund housing for low-income households and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition I, Providing Housing for Homeless Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $19,000,000 in bonds to fund housing for the homeless population and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $19,000,000 in bonds to fund housing for the homeless population and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Dallas, Texas, Proposition J, Information Technology Facilities Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $5,000,000 in bonds to fund information technology facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $5,000,000 in bonds to fund information technology facilities and to levy a tax to repay the bonds. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition A, Redefine Term in City Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to redefine term to mean in excess of annual consecutive statutory election dates. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to redefine term, thereby maintaining that term means more than one year of elected service. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition B, Require Redistricting Every Ten Years Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to require redistricting of city council districts every 10 years. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to require redistricting of city council districts every 10 years, thereby maintaining the existing redistricting schedule of every five years. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition C, Redistricting Criteria Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add redistricting criteria including equal population, continuity, compactness, respect for political subdivisions and communities, and non-partisanship. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add redistricting criteria. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition D, City Councilmember Qualifications Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to prohibit anyone who has been convicted of a felony or Class A misdemeanor from serving on the city council. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to prohibit anyone who has been convicted of a felony or Class A misdemeanor from serving on the city council. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to increase the compensation for the mayor from $575 per month to $675 per month and the compensation for the city council from $288 per month to $340 per month. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to increase the compensation for the mayor from $575 per month to $675 per month and the compensation for the city council from $288 per month to $340 per month. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition F, Gender Neutral Language Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to make the language in Article III, Section 4 gender neutral. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to make the language in Article III, Section 4 gender neutral. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add the office of Deputy Mayor Pro Tempore to the city charter. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add the office of Deputy Mayor Pro Tempore to the city charter. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to add a 30-day deadline for the governor to respond to an election petition from the city before the city council can fulfill the vacancy by appointment. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to add a 30 day deadline for the governor to respond to an election petition from the city before the city council can fulfill the vacancy by appointment. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to authorize the council to remove any non-contracted appointed positions upon an affirmative vote of five councilmembers. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize the council to remove any non-contracted appointed positions upon an affirmative vote of five councilmembers. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to change the enforcement procedure for improper communication with appointments. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to change the enforcement procedure for improper communication with appointments. |
A "yes" vote supports amending the city charter to limit contracts with a city auditor to five years. |
A "no" vote opposes amending the city charter to limit contracts with a city auditor to five years. |
A "yes" vote supports amending the city charter to limit contracts with a city manager to five years. |
A "no" vote opposes amending the city charter to limit contracts with a city manager to five years. |
A "yes" vote supports amending the city charter to limit contracts with a city attorney to five years. |
A "no" vote opposes amending the city charter to limit contracts with a city attorney to five years. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to authorize the mayor to fill the vacancy of the at-large member on the Plan Commission through appointment. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize the mayor to fill the vacancy of the at-large member on the Plan Commission through appointment. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition O, City Council Zoning Powers Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to clarify the zoning powers of the city council. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to clarify the zoning powers of the city council. |
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to authorize delegation of certain plat approval to the Planning Director. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to authorize delegation of certain plat approval to the Planning Director. |
• Garland, Texas, Proposition Q, Municipal Election Date Changes Charter Amendment (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported amending the city charter to remove references to May elections and align municipal elections with state elections. |
A "no" vote opposed amending the city charter to remove references to May elections and align municipal elections with state elections. |
• Irving, Texas, Proposition A, City Hall Bond Measure (May 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to issue $200 million in bonds to fund a new city hall complex and impose a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to issue $200 million in bonds to fund a new city hall complex and impose a tax to repay the bonds. |
El Paso County
- See also: El Paso County, Texas ballot measures
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to issue $378,955,000 in bonds to fund renovations of school facilities and to impose a property tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to issue $378,955,000 in bonds to fund renovations of school facilities and to impose a property tax to repay the bonds. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to issue $7,285,000 in bonds to fund the repayment of maintenance tax notes issued in 2020 to fund laptops for students and impose a tax to repay the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to issue $7,285,000 in bonds to fund the repayment of maintenance tax notes issued in 2020 to fund laptops for students and impose a tax to repay the bonds. |
Lubbock County
- See also: Lubbock County, Texas ballot measures
• Lubbock, Texas, Proposition A, Marijuana Decriminalization Initiative (May 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported decriminalizing Class A or Class B misdemeanor marijuana possession offenses for adults, with certain exceptions. |
A "no" vote opposed decriminalizing Class A or Class B misdemeanor marijuana possession offenses for adults, with certain exceptions. |
Nueces County
- See also: Nueces County, Texas ballot measures
• Calallen Independent School District, Texas, Proposition A, School Stadiums Bond Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the school district to issue $12.573 million in bonds for the construction, improvement, and equipment of three school stadiums and levying a property tax to pay for the bonds. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the school district to issue $12.573 million in bonds for the construction, improvement, and equipment of three school stadiums and levying a property tax to pay for the bonds. |
Tarrant County
- See also: Tarrant County, Texas ballot measures
• Fort Worth, Texas, Measure A, Hotel Tax to Fund Convention Center Renovation (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to impose a 2% hotel tax to fund the renovations of the city's convention center. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to impose a 2% hotel tax to fund the renovations of the city's convention center. |
Travis County
- See also: Travis County, Texas ballot measures
• Austin, Texas, Proposition A, Disannex Lost Creek Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to disannex 738 acres known as Lost Creek removing the area from city limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to disannex 738 acres known as Lost Creek removing the area from city limits. |
• Austin, Texas, Proposition B, Disannex Mooreland Addition Measure (May 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to disannex four acres known as Mooreland Addition removing the area from city limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to disannex four acres known as Mooreland Addition removing the area from city limits. |
• Austin, Texas, Proposition C, Disannex Blue Goose Road Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to disannex 28 acres known as Blue Goose Road removing the area from city limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to disannex 28 acres known as Blue Goose Road removing the area from city limits. |
• Austin, Texas, Proposition D, Disannex Lennar at Malone Measure (May 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to disannex 40.48 acres known as Lennar at Malone removing the area from city limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to disannex 40.48 acres known as Lennar at Malone removing the area from city limits. |
• Austin, Texas, Proposition E, Disannex Wildhorse Webb Tract Measure (May 2024): ✖
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to disannex 104 acres known as Wildhorse/Webb Tract removing the area from city limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to disannex 104 acres known as Wildhorse/Webb Tract removing the area from city limits. |
• Austin, Texas, Proposition F, Disannex River Place Outparcels Measure (May 2024): ✔
A "yes" vote supported authorizing the city to disannex 212 acres known as River Place Outparcels removing the area from city limits. |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the city to disannex 212 acres known as River Place Outparcels removing the area from city limits. |
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Texas
Click "Show" to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.
| How to cast a vote in Texas | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll timesIn Texas, all polling places are open from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. local time. Texas is divided between the Central and Mountain time zones. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.[1]
Registration
To register to vote in Texas, an applicant must be a United States citizen, a resident of the county in which he or she is registering, and at least 17 years and 10 months old.[2] The deadline to register to vote is 30 days before the election. Prospective voters can request a postage-paid voter registration form online or complete the form online and return it to the county voter registrar. Applications are also available at a variety of locations including the county voter registrar’s office, the secretary of state’s office, libraries, and high schools. Voter registration certificates are mailed to newly registered voters.[3] Automatic registrationTexas does not practice automatic voter registration.[4] Online registration
Texas does not permit online voter registration.[4] Same-day registrationTexas does not allow same-day voter registration.[4] Residency requirementsProspective voters must reside in the county in which they are registering to vote.[5] Verification of citizenshipTexas does not require proof of citizenship for voter registration. An individual applying to register to vote must attest that they are a U.S. citizen under penalty of perjury. State law requires election officials to conduct a check of registered voters' citizenship status. Section 18.068 of the Texas Election Code says the following:
In January 2019, the Texas secretary of state’s office announced that it would be providing local election officials with a list of registered voters who obtained driver’s licenses or IDs with documentation such as work visas or green cards. Counties would then be able to require voters on the list to provide proof of citizenship within 30 days.[8] The review was halted by a federal judge in February 2019, and Secretary of State David Whitley rescinded the advisory in April.[9][10] A news release from Whitley’s office stated that “... going forward, the Texas Secretary of State's office will send to county voter registrars only the matching records of individuals who registered to vote before identifying themselves as non-U.S. citizens to DPS when applying for a driver's license or personal identification card. This will ensure that naturalized U.S. citizens who lawfully registered to vote are not impacted by this voter registration list maintenance process.”[11] All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment.[12] As of November 2024, five states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, and New Hampshire — had passed laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration. However, only two of those states' laws were in effect, in Arizona and New Hampshire. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allowed noncitizens to vote in some local elections as of November 2024. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters. Verifying your registrationThe Texas Secretary of State’s office allows residents to check their voter registration status online by visiting this website.
Voter ID requirementsTexas requires voters to present photo identification while voting.[13] The following list of accepted ID was current as of February 2023. Click here for the Texas Secretary of State's page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information.
Identification provided by voters aged 18-69 may be expired for no more than four years before the election date. Voters aged 70 and older can use an expired ID card regardless of how long ago the ID expired.[13] Voters who are unable to provide one of the ID options listed above can sign a Reasonable Impediment Declaration and provide one of the following supporting documents:[13]
The following voters are exempt from showing photo ID:[13]
Voters who do not have a photo ID can obtain a Texas Election Identification Certificate (EIC) at any Texas driver’s license office during regular business hours. Voters can also obtain an Election Identification Certificate from a mobile station. Locations are listed here.[13] | ||||||
See also
Footnotes
- ↑ VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
- ↑ Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
- ↑ Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed July 28, 2024
- ↑ Texas Secretary of State, "Request for Voter Registration Applications," accessed July 28, 2024
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
- ↑ The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
- ↑ The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
- ↑ The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
- ↑ Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content
