Package Details: qt-sudo 2.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/qt-sudo.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: qt-sudo
Description: A clone of LXQt sudo tool, without LXQt libs
Upstream URL: https://github.com/aarnt/qt-sudo.git
Licenses: LGPL2.1
Submitter: matmoul
Maintainer: sl1pkn07
Last Packager: sl1pkn07
Votes: 104
Popularity: 39.44
First Submitted: 2024-03-11 02:38 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-25 22:50 (UTC)

Latest Comments

SArpnt commented on 2024-07-31 18:18 (UTC)

sudo shouldn't be a dependency of lx-sudo, since doas works and does not provide sudo. sudo isn't required for building either, aur packages can be built with doas by setting PACMAN_AUTH in /etc/makepkg.conf

from my testing both sudo and doas should be optdepends

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-05-20 18:33 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-21 21:31 (UTC) by yochananmarqos)

@doppelhelix: I was going to suggest creating an upstream issue, however @xiota already did: https://github.com/aarnt/qt-sudo/issues/2

doppelhelix commented on 2024-05-20 18:13 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-20 18:14 (UTC) by doppelhelix)

I'm torn. Since qt-sudo --version will return with 1.4.0 I can see how this might be the correct pkgver.

However. There are no tags or releases on git for this package. This is a mess.

That's why I created https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt-sudo-git that follows the number of revisions for now.

I remember that some gnome-shell-extensions suffer from the same problem. git-release numbers differ from the version reported by metadata.json.

In the non-git package on aur the metadata.json precedes the tags on git.

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-05-19 23:31 (UTC)

@xiota: That "version" hasn't been touched in any of the upstream commits. That might have been leftover from forking from lxqt-sudo.

xiota commented on 2024-05-19 22:53 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos Version is at sudo.cpp#L70.

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-05-19 22:12 (UTC)

@sl1pkn07: Thanks for updating it. However, I'm a bit confused about how you're generating the pkgver. Upstream has no tags, so you're still inventing one as far as I can see.

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-05-18 23:40 (UTC)

@sl1pkn07: Please build with Qt6 as octopi now depends on it.

Please don't invent a pkgver.

Improved PKGBUILD