Package Details: librewolf-bin 130.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/librewolf-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: librewolf-bin
Description: Community-maintained fork of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom.
Upstream URL: https://librewolf-community.gitlab.io/
Keywords: browser web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: librewolf
Provides: librewolf
Submitter: lsf
Maintainer: lsf
Last Packager: lsf
Votes: 389
Popularity: 14.91
First Submitted: 2019-06-16 13:12 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-21 16:57 (UTC)

Dependencies (16)

Required by (26)

Sources (7)

Pinned Comments

lsf commented on 2021-11-10 12:14 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-17 07:18 (UTC) by lsf)

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Acquire_a_PGP_public_key_if_needed

gpg --keyserver hkp:https://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 031F7104E932F7BD7416E7F6D2845E1305D6E801

/edit: starting with 112.0-1, the binaries are signed with the maintainers shared key, so gpg --keyserver hkp:https://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 662E3CDD6FE329002D0CA5BB40339DD82B12EF16 should do the trick instead. I've also signed the key with the previously used key, so you have at least some guarantee that it's not a malicious attack :)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 19 Next › Last »

Wrona777 commented on 2024-09-23 22:58 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-23 23:00 (UTC) by Wrona777)

@muhlinux

/usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so is owned by librewolf-bin 130.0.1-1

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 147710952 Sep 22 19:06 /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so*

for me its fine.

muhlinux commented on 2024-09-23 11:16 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-23 11:16 (UTC) by muhlinux)

libxul.so is corrupted in librewolf-bin 130.0.1-1

librewolf
XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so:
/usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so: file too short
Couldn't load XPCOM.

size is 0 bytes

ls -l /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Sep 23 13:14 /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so

<deleted-account> commented on 2024-09-13 08:20 (UTC)

Today was my third attempt at installing the current version (130) of LibreWolf to my up-to-date Manjaro KDE system. Two issues:

  1. The built took ages, around 15 mins., and then
  2. it failed, closing the Konsole window w/out warning.

Has anyone here experienced the same issue?

EDIT 2024-09-15: Don’t bother, I installed the Flatpak version.

lsf commented on 2024-08-06 17:10 (UTC)

For quite some time now, the -bin version of the package has not been based on the Arch specific (source) PKGBUILD anymore, and thus does not include profiling anymore, for example, and probably some performance related build options.

So: It might be worth checking out the upstream repo(s) https://codeberg.org/librewolf/source and potentially open a PR (or an issue at https://codeberg.org/librewolf/issues/issues) regarding potential improvements on that front. Thanks!

mabod commented on 2024-08-06 16:09 (UTC)

@blutuna: Your results are even worse than mine: 30 % performance drop for LW compared to FF. Although they share the same source code. That is odd.

blutuna commented on 2024-08-06 11:41 (UTC)

@karoyli... I get the following on my 5950, no tweaks to the installs... FF = 21.1 LW = 15.7 Floorp = 13.6 SRWare Iron = 20.6 Mullvad = 8.64

MrClon commented on 2024-08-05 05:24 (UTC)

May be librewolf disable some runtime optimization for privacy reasons

mabod commented on 2024-08-04 18:48 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-04 20:08 (UTC) by mabod)

Nice joke. But still, from my point of view librewolf should at least reach the same performance ratings as firefox.

karolyi commented on 2024-08-04 17:39 (UTC)

@mabod, if that matters: I get a value of Infinity (no kidding) with a self-compiled librewolf (only my own patch is applied extra, it's why I compile manually), and 21.4 on FF 128.0 on my 5950.

I guess my librewolf surpassed lightspeed? :)

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 19 Next › Last »