-
Structured Inverse-Free Natural Gradient: Memory-Efficient & Numerically-Stable KFAC
Authors:
Wu Lin,
Felix Dangel,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Kirill Neklyudov,
Agustinus Kristiadi,
Richard E. Turner,
Alireza Makhzani
Abstract:
Second-order methods such as KFAC can be useful for neural net training. However, they are often memory-inefficient since their preconditioning Kronecker factors are dense, and numerically unstable in low precision as they require matrix inversion or decomposition. These limitations render such methods unpopular for modern mixed-precision training. We address them by (i) formulating an inverse-fre…
▽ More
Second-order methods such as KFAC can be useful for neural net training. However, they are often memory-inefficient since their preconditioning Kronecker factors are dense, and numerically unstable in low precision as they require matrix inversion or decomposition. These limitations render such methods unpopular for modern mixed-precision training. We address them by (i) formulating an inverse-free KFAC update and (ii) imposing structures in the Kronecker factors, resulting in structured inverse-free natural gradient descent (SINGD). On modern neural networks, we show that SINGD is memory-efficient and numerically robust, in contrast to KFAC, and often outperforms AdamW even in half precision. Our work closes a gap between first- and second-order methods in modern low-precision training.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2024; v1 submitted 9 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Modern Neural Network Architectures
Authors:
Runa Eschenhagen,
Alexander Immer,
Richard E. Turner,
Frank Schneider,
Philipp Hennig
Abstract:
The core components of many modern neural network architectures, such as transformers, convolutional, or graph neural networks, can be expressed as linear layers with $\textit{weight-sharing}$. Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature (K-FAC), a second-order optimisation method, has shown promise to speed up neural network training and thereby reduce computational costs. However, there is currentl…
▽ More
The core components of many modern neural network architectures, such as transformers, convolutional, or graph neural networks, can be expressed as linear layers with $\textit{weight-sharing}$. Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature (K-FAC), a second-order optimisation method, has shown promise to speed up neural network training and thereby reduce computational costs. However, there is currently no framework to apply it to generic architectures, specifically ones with linear weight-sharing layers. In this work, we identify two different settings of linear weight-sharing layers which motivate two flavours of K-FAC -- $\textit{expand}$ and $\textit{reduce}$. We show that they are exact for deep linear networks with weight-sharing in their respective setting. Notably, K-FAC-reduce is generally faster than K-FAC-expand, which we leverage to speed up automatic hyperparameter selection via optimising the marginal likelihood for a Wide ResNet. Finally, we observe little difference between these two K-FAC variations when using them to train both a graph neural network and a vision transformer. However, both variations are able to reach a fixed validation metric target in $50$-$75\%$ of the number of steps of a first-order reference run, which translates into a comparable improvement in wall-clock time. This highlights the potential of applying K-FAC to modern neural network architectures.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2024; v1 submitted 1 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Benchmarking Neural Network Training Algorithms
Authors:
George E. Dahl,
Frank Schneider,
Zachary Nado,
Naman Agarwal,
Chandramouli Shama Sastry,
Philipp Hennig,
Sourabh Medapati,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Priya Kasimbeg,
Daniel Suo,
Juhan Bae,
Justin Gilmer,
Abel L. Peirson,
Bilal Khan,
Rohan Anil,
Mike Rabbat,
Shankar Krishnan,
Daniel Snider,
Ehsan Amid,
Kongtao Chen,
Chris J. Maddison,
Rakshith Vasudev,
Michal Badura,
Ankush Garg,
Peter Mattson
Abstract:
Training algorithms, broadly construed, are an essential part of every deep learning pipeline. Training algorithm improvements that speed up training across a wide variety of workloads (e.g., better update rules, tuning protocols, learning rate schedules, or data selection schemes) could save time, save computational resources, and lead to better, more accurate, models. Unfortunately, as a communi…
▽ More
Training algorithms, broadly construed, are an essential part of every deep learning pipeline. Training algorithm improvements that speed up training across a wide variety of workloads (e.g., better update rules, tuning protocols, learning rate schedules, or data selection schemes) could save time, save computational resources, and lead to better, more accurate, models. Unfortunately, as a community, we are currently unable to reliably identify training algorithm improvements, or even determine the state-of-the-art training algorithm. In this work, using concrete experiments, we argue that real progress in speeding up training requires new benchmarks that resolve three basic challenges faced by empirical comparisons of training algorithms: (1) how to decide when training is complete and precisely measure training time, (2) how to handle the sensitivity of measurements to exact workload details, and (3) how to fairly compare algorithms that require hyperparameter tuning. In order to address these challenges, we introduce a new, competitive, time-to-result benchmark using multiple workloads running on fixed hardware, the AlgoPerf: Training Algorithms benchmark. Our benchmark includes a set of workload variants that make it possible to detect benchmark submissions that are more robust to workload changes than current widely-used methods. Finally, we evaluate baseline submissions constructed using various optimizers that represent current practice, as well as other optimizers that have recently received attention in the literature. These baseline results collectively demonstrate the feasibility of our benchmark, show that non-trivial gaps between methods exist, and set a provisional state-of-the-art for future benchmark submissions to try and surpass.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Promises and Pitfalls of the Linearized Laplace in Bayesian Optimization
Authors:
Agustinus Kristiadi,
Alexander Immer,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Vincent Fortuin
Abstract:
The linearized-Laplace approximation (LLA) has been shown to be effective and efficient in constructing Bayesian neural networks. It is theoretically compelling since it can be seen as a Gaussian process posterior with the mean function given by the neural network's maximum-a-posteriori predictive function and the covariance function induced by the empirical neural tangent kernel. However, while i…
▽ More
The linearized-Laplace approximation (LLA) has been shown to be effective and efficient in constructing Bayesian neural networks. It is theoretically compelling since it can be seen as a Gaussian process posterior with the mean function given by the neural network's maximum-a-posteriori predictive function and the covariance function induced by the empirical neural tangent kernel. However, while its efficacy has been studied in large-scale tasks like image classification, it has not been studied in sequential decision-making problems like Bayesian optimization where Gaussian processes -- with simple mean functions and kernels such as the radial basis function -- are the de-facto surrogate models. In this work, we study the usefulness of the LLA in Bayesian optimization and highlight its strong performance and flexibility. However, we also present some pitfalls that might arise and a potential problem with the LLA when the search space is unbounded.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2023; v1 submitted 17 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Posterior Refinement Improves Sample Efficiency in Bayesian Neural Networks
Authors:
Agustinus Kristiadi,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Philipp Hennig
Abstract:
Monte Carlo (MC) integration is the de facto method for approximating the predictive distribution of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs). But, even with many MC samples, Gaussian-based BNNs could still yield bad predictive performance due to the posterior approximation's error. Meanwhile, alternatives to MC integration tend to be more expensive or biased. In this work, we experimentally show that the…
▽ More
Monte Carlo (MC) integration is the de facto method for approximating the predictive distribution of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs). But, even with many MC samples, Gaussian-based BNNs could still yield bad predictive performance due to the posterior approximation's error. Meanwhile, alternatives to MC integration tend to be more expensive or biased. In this work, we experimentally show that the key to good MC-approximated predictive distributions is the quality of the approximate posterior itself. However, previous methods for obtaining accurate posterior approximations are expensive and non-trivial to implement. We, therefore, propose to refine Gaussian approximate posteriors with normalizing flows. When applied to last-layer BNNs, it yields a simple \emph{post hoc} method for improving pre-existing parametric approximations. We show that the resulting posterior approximation is competitive with even the gold-standard full-batch Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2022; v1 submitted 20 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Mixtures of Laplace Approximations for Improved Post-Hoc Uncertainty in Deep Learning
Authors:
Runa Eschenhagen,
Erik Daxberger,
Philipp Hennig,
Agustinus Kristiadi
Abstract:
Deep neural networks are prone to overconfident predictions on outliers. Bayesian neural networks and deep ensembles have both been shown to mitigate this problem to some extent. In this work, we aim to combine the benefits of the two approaches by proposing to predict with a Gaussian mixture model posterior that consists of a weighted sum of Laplace approximations of independently trained deep ne…
▽ More
Deep neural networks are prone to overconfident predictions on outliers. Bayesian neural networks and deep ensembles have both been shown to mitigate this problem to some extent. In this work, we aim to combine the benefits of the two approaches by proposing to predict with a Gaussian mixture model posterior that consists of a weighted sum of Laplace approximations of independently trained deep neural networks. The method can be used post hoc with any set of pre-trained networks and only requires a small computational and memory overhead compared to regular ensembles. We theoretically validate that our approach mitigates overconfidence "far away" from the training data and empirically compare against state-of-the-art baselines on standard uncertainty quantification benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learning
Authors:
Erik Daxberger,
Agustinus Kristiadi,
Alexander Immer,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Matthias Bauer,
Philipp Hennig
Abstract:
Bayesian formulations of deep learning have been shown to have compelling theoretical properties and offer practical functional benefits, such as improved predictive uncertainty quantification and model selection. The Laplace approximation (LA) is a classic, and arguably the simplest family of approximations for the intractable posteriors of deep neural networks. Yet, despite its simplicity, the L…
▽ More
Bayesian formulations of deep learning have been shown to have compelling theoretical properties and offer practical functional benefits, such as improved predictive uncertainty quantification and model selection. The Laplace approximation (LA) is a classic, and arguably the simplest family of approximations for the intractable posteriors of deep neural networks. Yet, despite its simplicity, the LA is not as popular as alternatives like variational Bayes or deep ensembles. This may be due to assumptions that the LA is expensive due to the involved Hessian computation, that it is difficult to implement, or that it yields inferior results. In this work we show that these are misconceptions: we (i) review the range of variants of the LA including versions with minimal cost overhead; (ii) introduce "laplace", an easy-to-use software library for PyTorch offering user-friendly access to all major flavors of the LA; and (iii) demonstrate through extensive experiments that the LA is competitive with more popular alternatives in terms of performance, while excelling in terms of computational cost. We hope that this work will serve as a catalyst to a wider adoption of the LA in practical deep learning, including in domains where Bayesian approaches are not typically considered at the moment.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022; v1 submitted 28 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Continual Deep Learning by Functional Regularisation of Memorable Past
Authors:
Pingbo Pan,
Siddharth Swaroop,
Alexander Immer,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Richard E. Turner,
Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan
Abstract:
Continually learning new skills is important for intelligent systems, yet standard deep learning methods suffer from catastrophic forgetting of the past. Recent works address this with weight regularisation. Functional regularisation, although computationally expensive, is expected to perform better, but rarely does so in practice. In this paper, we fix this issue by using a new functional-regular…
▽ More
Continually learning new skills is important for intelligent systems, yet standard deep learning methods suffer from catastrophic forgetting of the past. Recent works address this with weight regularisation. Functional regularisation, although computationally expensive, is expected to perform better, but rarely does so in practice. In this paper, we fix this issue by using a new functional-regularisation approach that utilises a few memorable past examples crucial to avoid forgetting. By using a Gaussian Process formulation of deep networks, our approach enables training in weight-space while identifying both the memorable past and a functional prior. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on standard benchmarks and opens a new direction for life-long learning where regularisation and memory-based methods are naturally combined.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principles
Authors:
Kazuki Osawa,
Siddharth Swaroop,
Anirudh Jain,
Runa Eschenhagen,
Richard E. Turner,
Rio Yokota,
Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan
Abstract:
Bayesian methods promise to fix many shortcomings of deep learning, but they are impractical and rarely match the performance of standard methods, let alone improve them. In this paper, we demonstrate practical training of deep networks with natural-gradient variational inference. By applying techniques such as batch normalisation, data augmentation, and distributed training, we achieve similar pe…
▽ More
Bayesian methods promise to fix many shortcomings of deep learning, but they are impractical and rarely match the performance of standard methods, let alone improve them. In this paper, we demonstrate practical training of deep networks with natural-gradient variational inference. By applying techniques such as batch normalisation, data augmentation, and distributed training, we achieve similar performance in about the same number of epochs as the Adam optimiser, even on large datasets such as ImageNet. Importantly, the benefits of Bayesian principles are preserved: predictive probabilities are well-calibrated, uncertainties on out-of-distribution data are improved, and continual-learning performance is boosted. This work enables practical deep learning while preserving benefits of Bayesian principles. A PyTorch implementation is available as a plug-and-play optimiser.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2019; v1 submitted 6 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
