Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Greenberg, R I

Effective Wordle Heuristics

Authors: Ronald I. Greenberg

Abstract: While previous researchers have performed an exhaustive search to determine an optimal Wordle strategy, that computation is very time consuming and produced a strategy using words that are unfamiliar to most people. With Wordle solutions being gradually eliminated (with a new puzzle each day and no reuse), an improved strategy could be generated each day, but the computation time makes a daily exh… ▽ More While previous researchers have performed an exhaustive search to determine an optimal Wordle strategy, that computation is very time consuming and produced a strategy using words that are unfamiliar to most people. With Wordle solutions being gradually eliminated (with a new puzzle each day and no reuse), an improved strategy could be generated each day, but the computation time makes a daily exhaustive search impractical. This paper shows that simple heuristics allow for fast generation of effective strategies and that little is lost by guessing only words that are possible solution words rather than more obscure words. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Comments: 7 pages including references, 4 tables

Computing the Number of Longest Common Subsequences

Authors: Ronald I. Greenberg

Abstract: This note provides very simple, efficient algorithms for computing the number of distinct longest common subsequences of two input strings and for computing the number of LCS embeddings. This note provides very simple, efficient algorithms for computing the number of distinct longest common subsequences of two input strings and for computing the number of LCS embeddings. △ Less

Submitted 29 January, 2003; originally announced January 2003.

Comments: 3 pages, LaTeX

ACM Class: F.2.2; G.2.1

Bounds on the Number of Longest Common Subsequences

Authors: Ronald I. Greenberg

Abstract: This paper performs the analysis necessary to bound the running time of known, efficient algorithms for generating all longest common subsequences. That is, we bound the running time as a function of input size for algorithms with time essentially proportional to the output size. This paper considers both the case of computing all distinct LCSs and the case of computing all LCS embeddings. Also… ▽ More This paper performs the analysis necessary to bound the running time of known, efficient algorithms for generating all longest common subsequences. That is, we bound the running time as a function of input size for algorithms with time essentially proportional to the output size. This paper considers both the case of computing all distinct LCSs and the case of computing all LCS embeddings. Also included is an analysis of how much better the efficient algorithms are than the standard method of generating LCS embeddings. A full analysis is carried out with running times measured as a function of the total number of input characters, and much of the analysis is also provided for cases in which the two input sequences are of the same specified length or of two independently specified lengths. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2003; v1 submitted 28 January, 2003; originally announced January 2003.

Comments: 13 pages. Corrected typos, corrected operation of hyperlinks, improved presentation

ACM Class: G.2.1

Fast and Simple Computation of All Longest Common Subsequences

Authors: Ronald I. Greenberg

Abstract: This paper shows that a simple algorithm produces the {\em all-prefixes-LCSs-graph} in $O(mn)$ time for two input sequences of size $m$ and $n$. Given any prefix $p$ of the first input sequence and any prefix $q$ of the second input sequence, all longest common subsequences (LCSs) of $p$ and $q$ can be generated in time proportional to the output size, once the all-prefixes-LCSs-graph has been con… ▽ More This paper shows that a simple algorithm produces the {\em all-prefixes-LCSs-graph} in $O(mn)$ time for two input sequences of size $m$ and $n$. Given any prefix $p$ of the first input sequence and any prefix $q$ of the second input sequence, all longest common subsequences (LCSs) of $p$ and $q$ can be generated in time proportional to the output size, once the all-prefixes-LCSs-graph has been constructed. The problem can be solved in the context of generating all the distinct character strings that represent an LCS or in the context of generating all ways of embedding an LCS in the two input strings. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2011; v1 submitted 1 November, 2002; originally announced November 2002.

Comments: LaTeX 8 pages, 4 figures, corrected typos (especially in pseudocode in Figure 4)

ACM Class: F.2.2

On the Area of Hypercube Layouts

Authors: Ronald I. Greenberg, Lee Guan

Abstract: This paper precisely analyzes the wire density and required area in standard layout styles for the hypercube. The most natural, regular layout of a hypercube of N^2 nodes in the plane, in a N x N grid arrangement, uses floor(2N/3)+1 horizontal wiring tracks for each row of nodes. (The number of tracks per row can be reduced by 1 with a less regular design.) This paper also gives a simple formula… ▽ More This paper precisely analyzes the wire density and required area in standard layout styles for the hypercube. The most natural, regular layout of a hypercube of N^2 nodes in the plane, in a N x N grid arrangement, uses floor(2N/3)+1 horizontal wiring tracks for each row of nodes. (The number of tracks per row can be reduced by 1 with a less regular design.) This paper also gives a simple formula for the wire density at any cut position and a full characterization of all places where the wire density is maximized (which does not occur at the bisection). △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2001; originally announced May 2001.

Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures, LaTeX

ACM Class: C.1.2

Journal ref: condensed and revised in Information Processing Letters, v. 84, n. 1, pp. 41--46, Sep. 2002