Computer Science > Information Retrieval
[Submitted on 4 Apr 2022 (v1), last revised 17 Oct 2023 (this version, v6)]
Title:Tensor Completion with Provable Consistency and Fairness Guarantees for Recommender Systems
View PDFAbstract:We introduce a new consistency-based approach for defining and solving nonnegative/positive matrix and tensor completion problems. The novelty of the framework is that instead of artificially making the problem well-posed in the form of an application-arbitrary optimization problem, e.g., minimizing a bulk structural measure such as rank or norm, we show that a single property/constraint: preserving unit-scale consistency, guarantees the existence of both a solution and, under relatively weak support assumptions, uniqueness. The framework and solution algorithms also generalize directly to tensors of arbitrary dimensions while maintaining computational complexity that is linear in problem size for fixed dimension d. In the context of recommender system (RS) applications, we prove that two reasonable properties that should be expected to hold for any solution to the RS problem are sufficient to permit uniqueness guarantees to be established within our framework. This is remarkable because it obviates the need for heuristic-based statistical or AI methods despite what appear to be distinctly human/subjective variables at the heart of the problem. Key theoretical contributions include a general unit-consistent tensor-completion framework with proofs of its properties, e.g., consensus-order and fairness, and algorithms with optimal runtime and space complexities, e.g., O(1) term-completion with preprocessing complexity that is linear in the number of known terms of the matrix/tensor. From a practical perspective, the seamless ability of the framework to generalize to exploit high-dimensional structural relationships among key state variables, e.g., user and product attributes, offers a means for extracting significantly more information than is possible for alternative methods that cannot generalize beyond direct user-product relationships.
Submission history
From: Jeffrey Uhlmann [view email][v1] Mon, 4 Apr 2022 19:42:46 UTC (23 KB)
[v2] Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:23:13 UTC (24 KB)
[v3] Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:58:03 UTC (36 KB)
[v4] Thu, 13 Apr 2023 01:40:05 UTC (36 KB)
[v5] Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:56:32 UTC (37 KB)
[v6] Tue, 17 Oct 2023 17:06:34 UTC (427 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.