Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Double Administration? #59

Open
LostMySpirit opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Double Administration? #59

LostMySpirit opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@LostMySpirit
Copy link

grafik
So i use your silent miner and i wanted to ask what happens when i use the Defender exclusion in the miner builder itself and in the binder, does it break some functions of the miner when i have a fully configured miner with rootkit and all that other stuff?

And what is the difference between choosing native C and managed .net c# does that interact with the miner in anyway?

@UnamSanctam
Copy link
Owner

UnamSanctam commented Nov 8, 2023

So i use your silent miner and i wanted to ask what happens when i use the Defender exclusion in the miner builder itself and in the binder, does it break some functions of the miner when i have a fully configured miner with rootkit and all that other stuff?

Using it in both the binder and the builder is the optimal way of doing it, it will just run the command in both the binder and the miner.

And what is the difference between choosing native C and managed .net c# does that interact with the miner in anyway?

It just changes what kind of program the built file will be, it won't affect the miner in any way. https://github.com/UnamSanctam/UnamBinder/wiki#build-type

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants