-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add DCM from b-frame to v-frame #116
Comments
Hello, yes, adding this new DCM matrix could be a very good improvement. You can create a new branch from Please, just let me know if you want to become a NaveGo collaborator and I will allow to be part of our project. Kind regards. |
@rodralez If you have enough time now, you can finish it yourself. |
Usually, an IMU frame is known as the b-frame. It is assumed that the b-frame is aligned with the v-frame, as shown Fig A.
However, this may not be the case and there may be some angular misalignment between the v-frame and the b-frame as illustrated in Fig B
Assuming that the two frames have a roll angle , pitch angle , and azimuth angle , the DCM for these angles can be written as
If so, the b-frame data obtained from IMU needs to be adjusted, otherwise the calculated pitch , roll and yaw of the vehicle will be problematic, because the installation angle of IMU which is installed tiltly cannot be calculated into the actual pitch angle, roll angle and yaw angle.
If this DCM is added, the program will be more universal. After all, IMU installation is not necessarily consistent with the vehicle in many cases. The corresponding horizontal installation can be regarded as a special case, such as DCM = eye(3,3)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: